S-Frame subwoofer? - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th February 2010, 09:14 PM   #11
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Cornu Spiral Copy Horn
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2010, 07:21 AM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
chris661's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sheffield
Blog Entries: 8
Similar, but without the horn-related cross-sectional area changes.
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo
My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2010, 07:58 AM   #13
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris661 View Post
Instead of just folding the baffle once (ripole, S-frame, whatever you want to call it), why not fold it lots of times around the driver? You'd get some kind of spiral, not sure what that would do...
Chris,

That is essentially what you get when you stack multiple ripoles

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 07:40 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinitus View Post
It is
Someone created the "ripole" name fore commercial reasons

I think the original general describtion is "folded dipole"

I presented this, because I havent seen it this way before, with openings facing down and up
Drawing also shows kind of a marriage with H-frame, making the baffle effect more effective
Well, maybe kind of a dipole-omni hybrid

Hi Tinitus,

such a dipole standing on the floor with sound particle direction
orthogonal to the floor would have poor efficiency IMO.

1) For a Transducer based on sound particle velocity, the
position near a wall (floor) is in general the most
disadvantageous you can choose, because sound
particle velocity near walls tends to zero and the room
modes cannot be excited efficiently from there.

A wall (floor) can support a dipole sub only if the direction
of sound particle velocity is parallel to the wall.


2) Direction of sound particle velocity is bad especially
for exciting the lowest room modes which are usually
in the horizontal plane, because distances of the side walls
are longer than the distance from floor to ceiling.

3) You loose IMO one major advantage of a dipole sub:
The possibility to balance excitation of room modes by
rotating the direction of particle velocity !
This is a unique balancing technique which cannot be done
using monopolar subwoofers. Monopoloar subs have to be
moved around to balance excitation of room modes.
Dipoles can move AND rotate to modify in room response.

This is an additional degree of freedom usable for balancing
in room response which cannot be over estimated IMO.

Kind Regards
__________________
Oliver, RFZ believer (?)
www.dipol-audio.de

Last edited by LineArray; 18th February 2010 at 07:46 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 09:22 AM   #15
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Hmm, ok, you seem to know this

But it seems to me that some kind of "omni" dipole might work well
At least the one Im listening to right now
But its not something I tried properly, yet

The one I showed was an attempt on that, an "omni" dipole
No, I dont expect it to be very loud
I never play loud

So, you saying that if its turned around, and playing along the side walls, it will be better
Ahh, we could call it Z-fold, or Zorro
Attached Images
File Type: jpg H-frame sub.JPG (14.4 KB, 145 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 10:44 AM   #16
tinitus is offline tinitus  Europe
diyAudio Moderator R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Our new friend Chris might want to read these

Offene Schallwand (OB)

DIY-dipole-1
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2010, 12:21 PM   #17
jacq. is offline jacq.  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Well I had my idea on the subject a few years back for a Z frame, here is what it looked like below. It works great for music but as you mite guess the system as limited headroom.

Jacq.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00051r.jpg (440.2 KB, 126 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
H frame vs W frame dipole woofers rick57 Multi-Way 18 8th October 2011 04:58 PM
W-Frame or H-Frame dipoles? performace issues? JinMTVT Subwoofers 34 5th October 2006 04:44 PM
H frame/ Dipole/U frame ???????? j.burtt Multi-Way 24 1st May 2006 03:50 AM
H-Frame mcds Multi-Way 3 17th April 2004 03:50 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2