|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Similar, but without the horn-related cross-sectional area changes.
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
That is essentially what you get when you stack multiple ripoles dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Quote:
Hi Tinitus, such a dipole standing on the floor with sound particle direction orthogonal to the floor would have poor efficiency IMO. 1) For a Transducer based on sound particle velocity, the position near a wall (floor) is in general the most disadvantageous you can choose, because sound particle velocity near walls tends to zero and the room modes cannot be excited efficiently from there. A wall (floor) can support a dipole sub only if the direction of sound particle velocity is parallel to the wall. 2) Direction of sound particle velocity is bad especially for exciting the lowest room modes which are usually in the horizontal plane, because distances of the side walls are longer than the distance from floor to ceiling. 3) You loose IMO one major advantage of a dipole sub: The possibility to balance excitation of room modes by rotating the direction of particle velocity ! This is a unique balancing technique which cannot be done using monopolar subwoofers. Monopoloar subs have to be moved around to balance excitation of room modes. Dipoles can move AND rotate to modify in room response. This is an additional degree of freedom usable for balancing in room response which cannot be over estimated IMO. Kind Regards Last edited by LineArray; 18th February 2010 at 07:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Hmm, ok, you seem to know this
But it seems to me that some kind of "omni" dipole might work well At least the one Im listening to right now But its not something I tried properly, yet The one I showed was an attempt on that, an "omni" dipole No, I dont expect it to be very loud I never play loud So, you saying that if its turned around, and playing along the side walls, it will be better Ahh, we could call it Z-fold, or Zorro |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
Well I had my idea on the subject a few years back for a Z frame, here is what it looked like below. It works great for music but as you mite guess the system as limited headroom.
Jacq. |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| H frame vs W frame dipole woofers | rick57 | Multi-Way | 18 | 8th October 2011 04:58 PM |
| W-Frame or H-Frame dipoles? performace issues? | JinMTVT | Subwoofers | 34 | 5th October 2006 04:44 PM |
| H frame/ Dipole/U frame ???????? | j.burtt | Multi-Way | 24 | 1st May 2006 03:50 AM |
| H-Frame | mcds | Multi-Way | 3 | 17th April 2004 03:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |