|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Seattle Area
|
Folks,
This has probably been debated ad nauseum, but I hope you won't mind giving the gist of the debate. I am thinking to build a sealed sub based on Zapf's Dayton RSS315HF design. There is one thing that puzzles me: In a sealed sub enclosure, do you need a small weep hole so the air pressure can stabilize inside vs outside of the driver? One would think that changes in atmospheric pressure would put strain on the driver membrane. Not to mention the strain from the pressure formed when mounting the front baffle to the rest of the enclosure. Are there normally enough leaks in a sealed enclosure to take care of this or do I need to drill a 1 mm (or something equally tiny) hole somewhere? Thanks, ~Tom |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hillsborough, NC/McLean, VA
|
Nope, don't put any holes in it - sealed really is sealed
I'm not really sure what you mean by pressure when mounting the front baffle.
__________________
Jim J. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
|
This thought has occurred to me as well. When I had sealed speakers that I built, I just used the smallest drill bit I had and put a tiny hole in them. I couldn't feel anything at the hole with my finger when I played them. I just did it because they were in a car and I figured there may be some rapid pressure changes.
I think usually there is always some kind of slow leakage that would allow compensation for barometric pressure changes.
__________________
Doug Plumb |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
|
I always leave a slight gap between what i use to seal the driver to the enclosure, i might leave a 1mm gap in a sealing gasket. Your mention of 1mm would be ok. As you have realised, you need to make sure that the atmospheric pressure is always equalised on both sides of the driver. A tiny hole or a small gap in the seal between the driver & enclosure will keep the driver voice coil centered & allow maximum performance from the driver in a sealed box.
It does need to be tiny though
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Carlisle, England
|
Depending on how well a cabinet is sealed depends on whether an atmospheric relief hole is required or not.
I mostly port my cabinets so a hole isnt required. On the ones I have sealed there is always a small hole where the jack socket goes.
__________________
http://www.murtonpikesystems.co.uk PCBCAD40 pcb design software. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Seattle Area
|
Quote:
It seems the consensus is that the atmospheric pressure should be allowed to equalize. But of course, the weep hole should be small enough that it doesn't allow for air flow in the frequency range of interest. Now for a second question: Down-firing vs front-firing. What are the tradeoffs of one vs the other? Thanks, ~Tom |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Doerun, GA
|
Any air displaced by the driver will surely find it's way out while the driver is being mounted.
If you press a sealed-box woofer's cone in and it returns to center very slowly, there is still enough leakage to equalize atmospheric pressure changes they happen in a fixed locale. Were your box traveling vertically at 0.5 mach or so, then I would recommend a vent hole.
__________________
Tim |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Seattle Area
|
Good points everybody. Thanks!!
I seem to have found an "answer" to my second question about front vs down firing. Also see This Audioholics Thread. At least according to The Internetz, front vs down firing doesn't matter much for a sound quality perspective, though, there are some concerns about shag carpet eating up the sound quality. But down firing subs are supposedly easier to place. Ya' know... I think I'll build a box with a driver in it and play around with it. Thanks for your help guys (and gals). ~Tom |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
tsmith1315 gets it right. He understands that no driver is sealed, not even a PR system, so there never will be a difference between the inside and outside. Seal 'er up tight.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
suspension sag can be a problem for up or down firing subs, I don't think its a big deal unless its alum or other heavy cone with a large x-max *soft suspension for cone mass*
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Possible Vent Hole Issues? | timstupid22 | Construction Tips | 0 | 27th September 2009 11:24 PM |
| My sealed timber subs. | Foxx510 | Subwoofers | 12 | 28th March 2008 04:57 PM |
| Best subs for small Sealed enclosures | Dwn2rth | Car Audio | 0 | 18th May 2007 07:49 PM |
| Considering sealed vs vented for my AV12 subs | paulspencer | Subwoofers | 44 | 15th December 2004 01:07 PM |
| Vent hole trim? | CrisTUFR | Multi-Way | 6 | 21st July 2004 12:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12142 seconds (78.61% PHP - 21.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |