|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
|
Quote:
Is there a distortion measurement of the SDX10 woofer? The SDX15 has great output capability, but at somewhat mediocre distortion performance (see HTshack subwoofer measurements). |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miramichi NB
|
I seemed to of overlooked these ones that state they work in small sealed enclosures, however I could build a box the best size for sq.. Do these seem okay?
http://solen.ca/pdf/dayton/QT385-4.pdf http://solen.ca/pdf/dayton/QT305-4.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
The first one - the 15" looks nice in a 60 litre sealed box (F3 = 42Hz) but looks even better in a vented box, 120 litres, F3 = 25Hz. Port would be 10cm diameter, 30cm long.
I would do the larger vented box rather than EQ the smaller sealed. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miramichi NB
|
Thanks John... I want to stay with a closed box, and what about 2 of the 12'''s or 15''s one at each end? I tried to do a program, and it wants qtc which I don't see listed etc..
Any other ideas for a really high sq closed box sub, paper cone, under $300 in Canada already lol
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
|
Quote:
Have a look at my measurements (logsweep, ground plane 2m) to see performance in a small box. This box size and resulting Q and high power requirement is probably not your cup of tea, but I'm ultimately using Linkwitz transform and room EQ anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
If you don't mind my asking: Why? A properly designed vented sub will outperform a a sealed sub by a wide margin as far as actual bass production is concerned. Making the box bigger and the added complexity of installing a port are the only valid trade offs.
I use Unibox to model speakers. It is very good and very accurate once you learn how to use it and it uses the standard T/S specs. Qtc is the Q of the designed sealed box - for smoothest response it will be .707. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miramichi NB
|
I prefer sealed or closed is all
The requirements for me are sq, not high spl, low level listening detail, and I prefer paper cones or a blend thereof etc.. Just my usual preference and what I'd prefer etc...
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
|
If you are stuck on the idea of a sealed sub, have a look at the Peerless 830845
Solen has a kit listing for it as well as reference PDF of the enclosure Last edited by Cokewithlime; 20th December 2009 at 06:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Ok then...
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miramichi NB
|
That solen kit and the woofer mentioned is alu coned.. I had thought surely there must be a really good sq closed alignment design using a paper coned based woofer still? And no I didn't mean Shirley lol.. Thanks for all the help and ideas...
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10924 seconds (78.72% PHP - 21.28% MySQL) with 10 queries |