|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Hi all. After exhaustive searches to find plans for the JBL 4550A or 4550BKA, I got interested in modeling my own variant using Hornresp. With the help of people on this forum, other websites, and my Father who is a world-class engineer, I've become at least a little knowledgeable on horns, drivers, and tuned circuits. I now believe that I'm entering the "home stretch" of my design of a JBL 4550A copycat.
My current design consists of two JBL 2226J drivers, and differs from the 4550A in that I have no phasing plug (I believe that's what you'd call the thing in the middle of the 2 drivers in the 4550A), and the vent would be a single vent which would ride underneath the cabinet, rather than out to the sides. To this end, I have a few questions: 1) How do I model the vents in the JBL 4550A, which seem to be simple cut-outs in the side of the box, in Hornresp? To me, the 4550A looks like it simply wraps the rear chamber around to the side and just vents at the ends of the chamber, which should be perfectly "legal" with regard to horn theory, so long as the front-to-back length ("Lrc" in Hornresp) stays consistent, right? So to model this, should I specify Lpt = the wood thickness (0.75" = 1.905cm)? Or should I make Lpt equal to 1.905 times the number of vents? 2) I've noticed only extremely marginal improvements in the low-end response while playing with various parameters, like the chamber volume, the vent size, vent depth, etc. Changing vent parameters and the chamber volume seems to create a "hole" in the SPL graph somewhere below 30hz, however I can get rid of that hole by tweaking those parameters. But overall, I'm not seeing the kind of additional SPL by using a port as I would expect (I've compared to a sealed box - they're basically the same). What am I doing wrong? What should I expect out of a vent versus a sealed design? And since they seem to be the same (from what I can see) why do I care about vents anyway? 3) The thing in the middle of the drivers that I was referring to - what is its purpose? Is it a phasing plug as I supposed? What advantage does its presence have? How can I model one in Hornresp? I'll send my Hornresp parameters if necessary; I'm also attaching a couple pictures of a 4550A for reference - one is JBL, the other is a homebrew variant by a guy in Japan (wish I could get an email address for him...) which depicts the construction of these things as best I know it. Thanks in advance! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
They're main purpose as I see it is to control displacement near the LF-cutoff of your cabinet so you can get the power up to the coil heat limit. Frequency response be damned! We want it loud for PA
If the response fix is to raise what got lowered by the port, then nothing was achieved and it was a wash ![]() Nice pix by the way.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
The pics aren't mine.. I got them via google image search. But the Japanese do seem to love those 4550A's.
I'm having a hard time with your explanation. I'll concede that you *can* do that with the vent, as I've modeled in this fashion before (though I'm not clear on the mechanics behind it all). But every bit of reading I've done on horn theory suggests that the benefit of a vented front-loaded horn is that the vent becomes phase-additive with the output of the horn, and extends the LF response. Indeed this seems to be confirmed by Altec 817 literature, wherein they purport "Design of the front-loading enclosure loads the bass driver down to 150hz; the bass reflex porting extends the response to 50hz and lower when multiple units are used. I presume they mean that a single cabinet does 50hz in half-space - quite easy to believe - and that multiple cabs in parallel go lower because of the wider Q. See http://www.altecpro.com/pdfs/vintage...%20Cabinet.pdf if you care to see what I'm reading from. So what gives? What do the so-called "experts" on horn design have to say about it? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
There is a 6dB shelf in the response of these type of cabinets, about 160hz on the 4560 (single 15 version of the 4550).
Best use of 4560 type cabinets: ![]() Why do you want to build 4550s? The 2226 is not a very good driver for them. The 2220 allows them to reach 500hz, the mass corner of the 2226 is half that. (with the correct drivers) These kind of boxes were fine for the old SMPTE standard, a two-way with a 500hz crossover point. Of the big three (Altec A4, JBL4550, RCA Ubangi), the 4550 was kind of in the middle performance wise, the RCA had much better midrange. None of these had any 'real' bass.
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
*nod*
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
good night i am the venezuela no speack english the plans please i need the steps to this model took a week looking for and what is best I've read your comment thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
|
my e-mail luisjavieralvarado@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: São Paulo
|
Hi,
Plan Here: |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: São Paulo
|
and here:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Thank you _very_ much for the contribution. This is the first time I've seen plans for a 4550 on the Internet. Can you tell me about the source of those plans? Also, does your literature say anything about the reason for the section between the two 15" drivers?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| bigger backchamber for bms 4550...? | taotao | Multi-Way | 12 | 3rd July 2009 11:14 PM |
| BMS 4550 or B&C DE25? | pk | Multi-Way | 2 | 6th January 2008 11:40 AM |
| 3D Modeling?? | Nathan1k9 | Multi-Way | 18 | 10th January 2007 03:11 AM |
| Box Modeling please help | jadenlinkletter | Subwoofers | 5 | 18th June 2005 08:26 AM |
| Harman-Kardon avr 4550 schematic needed | mrlennon | Solid State | 5 | 15th March 2005 11:59 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12459 seconds (83.67% PHP - 16.33% MySQL) with 11 queries |