|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tyler,Texas
|
i have several speaker drivers laying around,and ones ive Experimented with in the Past...
it seems to me that a Weak Motor with a Very Compliant Suspension produces lower bass than a Weak Motor with a Very Stiff Suspension. it also seems that a Stronger Motor Paired with a Stiff Suspension still goes Fairly low...the Apex Jr Super 8" is a good Example of this to me...(FS around 50 because of stiff suspension,but still able to respond strongly to low Frequencies.)..some Examples Below. JVC 8" Woofer Paper Cone,2" Voice Coil,Aluminimum Former,Non Vented Motor. Foam Surround,Stiff Suspension,Simple Motor the Woofer's FR drops noticebly below 50 Hz. No Name 6.5" Woofer Paper Cone,.75" Voice Coil,Thick Paper Former,Non Vented Motor. Foam Surround,Very Flexible Suspension,Simple Motor the woofer's excursion and FR increase Below 50 Hz...and a fairly low amount of power causes large cone excursion. Walmart 12" Generic Brand Car Audio Subwoofer Driver Poly Cone,2" Dual Voice Coil,Aluminimum Former,Grilled Pole Vent. Rubber Surround,Very Flexible Suspension,Simple Motor. The Woofer responds strongly to low bass below 30's...sometimes the excursion seems sloppy and i get the impresion the woofer i doing little more than Flopping around,(Not Tightly Controlled) Doe Anybody Have an idea what im getting at?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herne
|
TBH, no. But to answer your question in the topic: a) the woofers enclosure and b) the room it is in.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Tyler,Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Midlands, England
|
Quote:
It's a little difficult to explain, let me attempt to think about it
__________________
"Never let your morals prevent you from doing what is right!" Salvor Hardin |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carson City, NV
|
strength of the motor is one factor, yes. how tight the voice coils are to the magnet assembly/pole, size of voice coil, honest length of linear excursion (basically how well the suspension is made and if the motor has room for the excursion), size of magnet assembly, suspension strength/stiffness, weight of the driver, and everything MaVo mentioned. There's probably more too.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Custom Title
diyAudio Member
|
Of course it does. It lowers Q but raises efficiency. Response at Fs usually stays about the same, but everything above rises.
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
I've been increasingly confronted with the affect of the room on performance lately. Just something to consider if you're getting noticeable peaks/dips in your frequency range.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herne
|
A big magnet, strong motor means that the speaker will need less watts to achieve the same excursion than a with a weaker motor, its more efficient. This often goes hand in hand with a lower qts value since membranes are not necessarily made heavier when motor strength increases. This in turn means that you can have a flat response in a smaller cab. But if you design all cabs for flat response, a weak motor and a strong motor will sound the same, just the cab size wil be different. Terms like "control over the cone" are misleading, as they make you think a strong motor is needed for sound quality, while this is absolutely false, as it all boils down to correct implementation of the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herne
|
A driver at its lower frequency edge will behave like a highpass filter for the signal. Like the filter, it has a q value, which determines the shape of its response. You can wikipedia this for some pictures for better understanding. The qts is this value. It is composed of the magnet strength, suspension and so on, basically all of the drivers physical qualities. You can influence this value with an enclosure. For example, put a driver in a smaller enclosure and qts goes up.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Good speakers in a bad room make for lousy sound. Modified speakers to suit the room modal issue makes for worse speakers.
__________________
Think out of the box
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| woofer in 2.5 way affecting polar response | thadman | Multi-Way | 0 | 15th June 2007 05:49 PM |
| lost bass response | Wagener | Solid State | 4 | 31st January 2007 08:06 AM |
| Optimizing bass response in Zen 4 | Buhl | Pass Labs | 10 | 10th March 2005 09:55 PM |
| Response 6.5" woofer from Jaycar | poeee | Multi-Way | 6 | 10th December 2004 11:56 AM |
| Brand New Jaycar Response 10" Woofer F/S | swin1 | Swap Meet | 0 | 26th August 2004 07:45 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11027 seconds (88.86% PHP - 11.14% MySQL) with 10 queries |