|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Singapore
|
Hi guys,
I was doing some surfing and came across a DVC subwoofer with different published BL number, depending on if the VCs are wired in series, or in parallel. On the website, the BL is effectively doubled for series VC, but is the same for single coil or parallel coil wiring. I was referring to the Maelstrom-X, incidentally. http://www.diycable.com/main/product...roducts_id=681 Got me thinking, this rockford sub i have (datasheet attached), i'm currently using wired in series. Is the BL effectively doubled based on the published specs? Also, any idea if the sensitivity of 87.9dB is with 1W power, or 2.83V input? Appreciate your knowledge on this. Thanks!! Gavin |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
b |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
Bl Doubles when wired in series and is the same for single or parallel coil The 87.8 figure is for 1W, from 2.83V you get ~91dB IF you wire in parallel (one ohm load) you get 97dB for 2.83V
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Ron,
What I've found is probably a minor point as few users will use a single coil in a real driver application but published T/S data should IMO always be correct. b |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Next door
|
Strictly speaking, Bl (in Tesla.meter) does not change in series or parallel configuration, as neither magnetic flux, B, nor length of wire in it, l, change. So the reference efficiency does not change in either configuration. But the sensitivity of the driver expressed for a given voltage usually normalised et 2.83 V, changes of course, because, with voice coils in parallel, there is four times more current in the motor than when in series, then four times hte movinf force.
Considered as the force factor, the misnommed Bl (in Newton/Ampere) changes with the configuration. With one ampere injected into the motor, there is 0.5 A in each coil when in parallel, and 1 A in each coil in series. This is the way how force factors are measured. To avoid confusion, it has been suggested to use the unequivocal terms "effective Bl" (where the length of wire is ignored) or "force factor "FF". Knowing the real meaning of "Bl" makes everything coherent. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Singapore
|
Forr,
I think i understand what you mean, bits of physics class coming back to me. However, Force on the coil is proportional to the B field strength (constant for a given motor), length of wire in the coil, as well as current flowing in the wire. As you said, series of parallel connection of the voice coils will cause a 4 x difference in current, but this implies there is a 4 x difference in power input. Obviously the force on the coil will be higher with higher power. I'm thinking, with the same 1W power: 1) Series coil will draw 1/4 of the current I, but have 2x length of coil L in the B field. F series = k*B*2L*1/4I = 0.5kBLI 2) Parallel coil each draws current 1/2I, but each have 1x length of coil L in the B field. F parallel = 2*k*B*L*1/2I = kBLI This seems to suggest it is better to use a DVC sub in parallel, provided of course the amp can drive the 1Ohm load... This is also contrary to the misleading impression that doubling BL with a series config is better, since high BL is good... Perhaps this is what Forr is trying to allude to. Did i confuse myself? Last edited by rhapsodee; 23rd September 2009 at 03:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
what's wrong with at least considering using the two 2ohm voice coils in series?
They will be a far easier load for the amplifier to drive, 4ohm cf 1ohm.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Agree,It's not my day today I'm ) To prove you're right Ive dug up a measurement I made for over a year ago on two Peerless 830846 DVC drivers where one was tested with a single coil and the other using both in series. b |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| B&K ST-202 Data | Chris Screven | Solid State | 1 | 7th April 2009 11:46 AM |
| Subwoofer crossover / subwoofer module design | derMichi | Subwoofers | 4 | 20th April 2006 10:31 AM |
| help with design SPL box (subwoofer T\S data inside) | Astro Power | Subwoofers | 3 | 11th January 2006 10:42 PM |
| how to connect a non powered subwoofer to a stereo system without a subwoofer output | JSD777 | Multi-Way | 4 | 20th September 2005 03:19 PM |
| I need help with subwoofer deisign: HUGE inexpensive subwoofer | hottyson | Subwoofers | 16 | 4th May 2004 03:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11485 seconds (81.21% PHP - 18.79% MySQL) with 11 queries |