|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chennai
|
I'm planning to build a compound subwoofer using two dainty (taiwan made)10 inch subwoofers. Initially I used one 10 inch driver in 4 cft sealed box and the results were ok(good for a cheap driver)
However I'm planning to go isobarik for two reasons. One is half of the original box volume. Two is reduced voice coil excursion at very low frequencies which I'm told will prevent the cone from bottoming out. Are there any more advantages to these two and what are the design parameters I have to take into consideration. To drive these speakers I will be using a plate amp with the capability to drive at 4 to 8 ohms bcs the single driver nominal impedence is 8 ohms and yes I will be connecting them in parellel |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I've never heard of reduced excursion at low frequencies. The half (ish) volume is correct.
To design a speaker for them - either use a program that supports iso-brarik loading, or design a box, half the volume (keep tuning frequency the same) and use that. Another thing with iso-brarik loading is the lower efficiency. You are, effectively, asking more power (2x voicecoils) to shift the same amount of air as one. I think the loss is around 3dB, which isn't the end of the world, but, if your speakers are inefficient as they are, you'll find yourself running out of power quickly. Chris
__________________
"Throwing parts at a failure is like throwing sponges at a rainstorm." - Enzo My setup: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi...tang-band.html
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Mark Kravchenko --- www.kravchenko-audio.com
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I've built a couple of Isobaric cabinets over the years. The only gain I have really found is in cabinet size. The second driver is basically sacrificed to get you a stronger compound motor. If it is smallest box size you are after then it is the way to go. There is no lessening of excursion at low frequencies by the way. THe driver behaves as a normal one with 3db of gain. And actually the inner driver takes quite a beating if you are unkind to it. I stopped making this kind of box for kids. They shred them in days. Mark
__________________
Mark |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Isobaric subwoofer: to do, or not to do? | Wavebourn | Multi-Way | 15 | 7th December 2010 05:06 AM |
| Compound or Composite Isobaric | The Rug Doctor | Subwoofers | 14 | 18th January 2008 10:20 AM |
| Compound Subwoofer with Dynaudio 30W100 | Hjalmar | Subwoofers | 1 | 31st October 2007 08:29 PM |
| Construction suggestions for compound curved subwoofer | paulspencer | Subwoofers | 49 | 30th August 2004 01:33 PM |
| Odd Heatsink Compound | EchoWars | Solid State | 2 | 24th August 2003 09:41 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |