|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Novi, Michigan
|
I'm redoing the white paper right now, its almost six years old. Best is to read the reviews. These are all very recent and enlightening. Then you can read the white paper in a couple of weeks and find out why the reviews are so good.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Thanks again Earl
Will do |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
About the Swarm
There is no doubt about using more subs will get you a better and more even bass. Take a look at this work done by Harman: http://www.harman.com/wp/pdf/multsubs.pdf More subs give a more even exitation of the room modes, and thereby a more even freq. response. /Baldin |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Thanks Baldin, I had read the paper.
But didn't think even multi subs could equal dipoles Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Quote:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...om#post1884538 * 20 Hz - 35 Hz: 1 a ) Monopole bass and dipole bass show identical room time response in all locations A - D. In all cases the envelope closely follows the input signal envelope. * 35 Hz - 100 Hz: 2 a ) Dipole shows clearly better room time response than monopole in all locations A - D. 2 b ) Monopole room time response is the most sensitive to placement A - D. 2 c ) Dipole room time response is less sensitive to placement A - D than monopole, but more sensitive than dipole line array. 2 d ) Dipole line array room time response is the least sensitive to placement A - D. 2 e ) Dipole line array room time response is almost identical to dipole room time response in all locations A - D. This is due the limited hight (1.5m) of the array and thus the array directivity in this freq range is not enough to improve the response over the dipole. * 100 Hz - 1 kHz: 3 a ) Monopole has worse room time response than dipole or dipole line array. 3 b ) Dipole has better room time response than monopole but worse than dipole line array. 3 c ) Dipole line array has the best room time response over monopole and dipole. 3 d) Monopole room time response is the most sensitive to placement A - D. 3 e) Dipole room time response is less sensitive to placement A - D than monopole, but more sensitive than dipole line array. 3 f) Dipole line array room time response is the least sensitive to placement A - D. 3 g) When approaching 1 kHz monopole and dipole room time responses are getting similar. This can be due to increased directivity of the monopole and decreased directivity of the dipole because of cone and baffle size. 3 h) At 1 kHz dipole line array still has the best room time response. So while my thread started off re bass, I'm now exploring dipole line arrays Thank you! |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 15 | 19th May 2012 03:12 PM |
| Open-baffle baffle length | matejS | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st September 2010 04:49 PM |
| Murphy baffle radios [ open baffle ] | keithpeter | Full Range | 10 | 11th September 2007 07:59 PM |
| what effect does baffle have on open-baffle system? | kappa546 | Multi-Way | 6 | 24th January 2006 10:21 PM |
| Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) | tktran | Multi-Way | 13 | 29th November 2004 11:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08779 seconds (85.39% PHP - 14.61% MySQL) with 10 queries |