|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Hi
Well, it looks like bandpass But is really only a double BR Volume and ports are exactly alike on both front and back Front and back port will be opposite phase Will this double BR work as a dipole sub bass ? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
|
I think that'd be somewhat different from <just a double BR>, because the front of both drivers see nothing! And all output is projected from the ports, that tends to be a bandpass box.
What is your expectation? Say, why not just bring in 2 BR boxes (with port on the rear), put them face to face, then you'll see what happen. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Hmm, a 6th order isobaric BP dipole which can be modeled in HR. The phase difference of the vent outputs when combined with the room's will dictate whether it ~cancels itself out or has any useful output. Careful though, using a 0 deg. off axis combined response only got me a :Run-time error '6', Overflow", so be forewarned.
Bottom line, for a usable BW it appears that the two chambers can't be tuned the same. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
Quote:
Good evaluation I think of it more like two BR subs, rather than a BW design Both driven by the same driver In this case isobaric pushpull, which with the double BR ought to be a very symmetrical load, and results in a smaller box But this only works when the ports are opposite phase, which means dipole Question is whether it may solve some of the known problem of combining mono pole subs with OB mains Another issue is cancelling, which I understand is worse the lower we get And this one is supposed to work only low, so may be a major issue I suppose the only way to find out is to build one |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dipole Ribbon tweeter isolation from dipole mid-woofer array | Bent | Planars & Exotics | 5 | 21st May 2009 12:10 PM |
| (WW) MMTMM dipole – 4 vs 3 way / dipole benefit frequencies? | charliemouse | Multi-Way | 25 | 7th July 2007 11:19 PM |
| 2 way vs 2.5 way vs dipole? | AudioGeek | Multi-Way | 0 | 23rd January 2007 10:58 PM |
| When is a dipole not a dipole anymore? | Bas Horneman | Multi-Way | 5 | 5th December 2003 03:02 PM |
| Dipole design -will this work? | Ian J | Multi-Way | 15 | 3rd August 2003 01:06 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08341 seconds (76.42% PHP - 23.58% MySQL) with 11 queries |