Options for fast bass

[paulspencer]

I think the OP has decided to run the other way. Now if only he had left out the words "fast bass" ...

[oon_the_kid]

Your right on this one. Maybe I should have used accurate and detailed bass.

However the posts have been most informative.

A bit busy at the moment. Will write a bit more later.

Oon

[djk]

Have any of you tried PPSL (push-pull slot loaded)?

It may be implemented as sealed, vented, di-pole, etc.



Posted by Les Hudson ( M ) ) on January 4, 2009 at 19:04:39
In Reply to: nice job !!!!!!!!! posted by Norman Bates on January 4, 2009 at 17:47:51:

I was expecting it to take some time to get aquainted with the way that it sounds but I knew within seconds that it was what I wanted. It's cleaner , faster and the kind of bass that usually comes from servo systems. I'm even able to drive the woofers much harder before cone break up.

My actual tuning came out to 33hz. and they sound very linear up to 400hz. Thanks

Some other projects from Les, just to see where he has been (front-load horns, rear-load horns, vented horns, di-pole, various direct radiator, etc):

http://gallery.audioasylum.com/cgi/v...33876&session=

[paulspencer]

djk,
very cool way to use push pull!

I like at that and immediately get an idea. This would look great. High gloss paint finish where the internal of the slot port and the inside of the "manifold" is white, and the rest of the box is black. Blue LEDs inside the white parts (or even make them blue) - very novel look in the dark! .... sorry, getting distracted here!

[planet10]

Originally posted by djk
Have any of you tried PPSL (push-pull slot loaded)?

I've made drawings but not built one yet.

dave