|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
What types of sub woofer sounds good and easy to build.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto and Delray Beach, FL
|
That's easy for me to answer and I have been quite certain of the answer since CDs came on the scene. Only a horn can blow enough air through a room to make good bass at realistic levels.
I also believe my opinion is probably distorted by "anthropomorphic" notions (rather than acoustic notions). A 15 inch driver in a horn moves gallons of air with ease. Funny how carefully the wonks fret about peak amp power without spending a second wondering how much air a wee 10 inch driver could possibly move relative to a large bass side-drum (I heard Tan Dun conduct his spectacular piece, The Map, two nights ago with the Toronto Sym Orch... wow). Pity they are the most complex constructions. Sad that SpeakerLab, great kit suppliers, died. I still miss 'em. Nasty footnote: never seen any blind testing of it let alone been part of one, but I've always had a visceral dislike for resonant boxes like bass-reflex and derivatives. Again, maybe just ignorant gut feel, but I've never "felt" the system resonance of sealed boxes and other minor tuning found in enclosures was objectionable. I suppose you could have a well-damped port that kept resonances in check in tuned enclosures.
__________________
Dennesen ESL tweets, Dayton-Wright ESL (110-3200Hz), Klipschorn mixed-bass woofer w/param. EQ plus 1954 AR-1W or giant OB HiFi construction since 1956 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It turns out that several different kinds all sound good, but people have different preferences so there isn't a simple answer.
Often it depends what you want it for e.g. Home Theatre - lots of big rumbling bass ? (usually means not as good for hi-end music) Car - some obvious limitations in terms of size ? Music - looking for accurate low distortion but maybe not ground destroying power ? Do you need a built-in amplifier (often called a Plate Amp) or will you buy an external amplifier ? Easiest to build is probably to find a kit that you can buy, a box and driver. Otherwise, I'd go so far as to say the easiest is a simple sealed box with a single driver in it. A box with a port (often a tube installed inside the box to a hole in the side of the box) isn't much more difficult and offers some benefits and disadvantages.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Soakin' up the Sound!
diyAudio Member
|
ataul,
If you're looking for one for music, this one might do http://www.rjbaudio.com/Cerberus/cerberus.html If not, Parts Express has a couple of plans that might work. Mike
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sammamish, WA
|
My experience is (and it is limited) that if you go with a ported design, you can get very high output levels with great bass, until you reach the lower limit, when they QUIT. Also, ported designs have a tendency to have humps in their response curve which some people like. A properly designed port will give good results, but they also have overshoot on notes, so they have a slower sounding attack and release.
I have planar speakers which are very "fast" which a ported sub doesn't match well to. For this I ended up with an NHT dual 10 sealed box that, altough a huge power hog, is very fast and tight and has a smooth response all the way to the bottom. It mates well with my planars. The bass doesn't sound as loud, but to my ears it is more realistic.... Keep in mind, that the surface area of your driver is positively related to output and negatively related to speed. I feel the ideal driver side for speed is 10". |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Custom Title
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Wow, you're a generalizations machine! "Fast" bass is a function of inductance and driver bandwidth, not driver size. Smaller drivers tend to have less Le and more top end extension, but this is not a hard and fast rule. Also, inductance varies with excursion (some motors keep it pretty constant, though) , so the driver 'speed' will change when it's pumping. Best to have a very large surface area moving gently, than a small one moving violently, in my experience.
__________________
I write for www.enjoythemusic.com in the DIY section. You may find yourself getting a preview of a project in-progress. Be warned! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Herne
|
fast bass?
Its just a myth, grown on bad room acoustics and wrong eq and crossover settings.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
OK, let's not get too sidetracked here.
ataul, Perhaps you could let us know a little more like your room size, volume requirements, what you are listening to etc. To ask a question like this, you will get too many answers to make sense of them. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver Island
|
Sealed box subwoofers have a lower order roll-off, which possibly means their transient response is better or something, from what I vaguely remember of circuit theory. They're also more tolerant of variations in woofer parameters.
In support, I'll submit the NHT SW3 which is/was a sealed box sub using the NHT1259 12". Several magazine reviews of subwoofers called it the most musical, but it'll rattle walls very well too. A lot of DIYers have and continue to build subs using that driver after it was made available to the general public. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
Easy to build include - a closed box. A lot of different ways to move air at LF, with different pluses and minuses. ( cost, size, complexity, etc, etc ) |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| B&W DM110 - Woofer sounds nasty, help | MikeHunt79 | Multi-Way | 3 | 2nd May 2008 05:56 PM |
| Sounds good, i like it, you may appreciate too. | destroyer X | Class D | 95 | 22nd February 2005 09:09 PM |
| (Eton woofer problem) Speakers almost done, but bass sounds boomy | Jimmy154 | Multi-Way | 47 | 13th August 2004 11:06 PM |
| Who determines what sounds good? | Theli | Multi-Way | 68 | 9th February 2004 05:01 AM |
| 24/96 and 24/192 is no good. MP3 sounds better! | peranders | Digital Source | 92 | 30th July 2002 09:30 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11188 seconds (82.69% PHP - 17.31% MySQL) with 10 queries |