slaps = acoustic lever?

jbell · 18th February 2009, 01:47 AM

Dumb question... but with the different size surrounds front and rear... is an earthquake slaps, effectively the same thing as dr. geddes acoustic lever? and is that why earthquake claims +6db?

Ron E · 18th February 2009, 09:29 AM

They probably claim +6dB because passive radiators don't suffer as much from port compression, although suspension nonlinearity can still be a factor.

jbell · 18th February 2009, 01:52 PM

Earthquake claims that a combination of the 'M' surround and the big roll surround that it's linear over 1.5" of travel (3" p-p). I have to believe that the differences in the surrounds presents different pressure areas on one side vs the other, which would be a lever.

I know in earthquake subs I've watched with the slaps, I see the slaps appear to move MUCH further than the driver.

My thought was that this is a lever, and it solves the issue geddes had with having a device mfg'd that would have sufficient travel, and not prematurely fail.

If this is a lever.. another interesting part to me, is that both the slaps, and the lever are patented..

Ron E · 18th February 2009, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jbell
I know in earthquake subs I've watched with the slaps, I see the slaps appear to move MUCH further than the driver.

My thought was that this is a lever

PR's generally move at least 2-3x as far as the active cone they are coupled with assuming they are the same size.

18th February 2009, 09:29 AM	#2
Ron E diyAudio Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: USA, MN	They probably claim +6dB because passive radiators don't suffer as much from port compression, although suspension nonlinearity can still be a factor. __________________ Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Dual CS 5000 Cueing Lever Question	seinfeld	Analogue Source	8	10th June 2008 03:41 AM
Leader LMV-1815 2 Ch Auto dB Lever Meter	Mikewong	Analogue Source	0	19th July 2007 06:27 AM
Acoustic Audio anyone?	stealthninja	Everything Else	7	23rd April 2007 10:38 PM
Acoustic Waveguide	Ed LaFontaine	Multi-Way	18	15th October 2006 07:59 PM
Acoustic pre-amp	james27_84	Instruments and Amps	4	23rd March 2005 06:49 PM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

18th February 2009, 01:52 PM	#3
jbell diyAudio Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: .	Earthquake claims that a combination of the 'M' surround and the big roll surround that it's linear over 1.5" of travel (3" p-p). I have to believe that the differences in the surrounds presents different pressure areas on one side vs the other, which would be a lever. I know in earthquake subs I've watched with the slaps, I see the slaps appear to move MUCH further than the driver. My thought was that this is a lever, and it solves the issue geddes had with having a device mfg'd that would have sufficient travel, and not prematurely fail. If this is a lever.. another interesting part to me, is that both the slaps, and the lever are patented..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)