Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st February 2009, 01:52 AM   #51
Bigun is offline Bigun  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Bigun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: K-W Ontario
Blog Entries: 2
Another worry,

With one speaker pointing out the front and one out the back - am I in danger of having the back wave reflect off the wall behind and canceling out the forward wave ? In essence do I have to worry about the two drivers sound field interacting ? (such that I have to orient drivers facing side to side instead of front to back)
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2009, 05:57 AM   #52
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
The wavelengths are too long... they don't exit and bounce, they ooze & flow... still i prefer to have them symetrically loaded. That is why i will orient the woofer so that it is "side" firing.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2009, 10:46 PM   #53
Bigun is offline Bigun  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Bigun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: K-W Ontario
Blog Entries: 2
It's time for action now

I'm going to reduce the designed box volume a bit more and drop the drivers nearer the floor as suggested. Instead of a physical volume of 50L it will be built closer to 30L and then stuffed a bit to bring it to a Qtc of approx. 0.65. It seems to me that this will have a marginal impact on F3 or F10 and to my way of thinking - if I was going for the ultimate sub I wouldn't be using 8" drivers anyway.

Talking of which, the TRIO8 drivers and a 300W BASH amp are en-route from Bob (Creative Sound Solutions) and I'll pick up some Birch ply from HD tomorrow (or the day after).
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
large v small drivers marec Full Range 15 23rd January 2008 08:49 PM
Multiple small drivers for large output? diarav Multi-Way 15 29th October 2006 08:39 AM
Large Driver or Multiple Small Drivers ??? emailtim Subwoofers 8 25th March 2006 10:02 PM
Using those small Creative titanium drivers (large pics) Otherwise Full Range 1 2nd December 2005 08:13 PM
tradeoffs in small vs. large drivers jdybnis Subwoofers 6 10th November 2004 12:24 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33 AM.

Page generated in 0.06807 seconds (73.25% PHP - 26.75% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio