|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I am about to start a new project, which is a pair of powered subwoofers.
I have purchased: 2x BX10 Bass Exciters by Ralph Mantel 2x BXP 10 matching passive radiators 2x Plate amps Purchased from http://www.lautsprechershop.de/english/index_hifi.htm BX 10 25 cm top class bass driver with coated paper cone, twin magnet, rubber surround, ventilated magnet system and sheet steel basket. output (continuous/programme): 150/300 Watt impedance: 4 Ohm resonance frequency fs: 30 Hz DC resistance Rdc: 3.5 Ohm mechanical Q factor : 6.76 electrical Q factor Qes: 0.36 total Q factor Qts: 0.34 equivalent volume of compliance Vas: 50.07 L voice coil inductance at 1 kHz: 3.12 mH effective mechanical mass incl. air load Mms: 91.3 g mechanical compliance Cms: 0.30 mm/N effective piston radiating area Sd: 365 cm2 electromagnetic force factor BI: 13.11 N/A sensitivity (2.83V /1m/1kHz): 87 dB voice coil height: 23.5 mm voice coil layers: 4 outside diameter: 258 mms cut-out required: 229 mm mounting depth: 133 mm countersunk depth: 11 mm cone diameter: 169 mm mounting holes: 8x5 mm on 250 mm diameter circle BXP 10 The passive radiator BXP10 was developed as an addition to the BX10 driver. The BXP10's excursion is double (a piece of cake for the passive one) compared with the BX10, possesses a rigid MDF cone and is easy to tune by attaching weights on the inside. outside diameter: 255 mm cut-out required: 223 mm mounting depth: 74 mm countersunk depth: 7 mm cone weight: 180 g resonance frequency in 17 litre cabinet: 46 Hz cone diameter: 169 mm surround width: 35 mm effective piston radiating area Sd: 365 cm2 mounting holes: 8x5 mm on 245 mm circle These will be placed in two small enclosures 30cmx30cmx26cm internal, 36cmx36cmx31cm external with 5cm legs My aesthetic preference is to have the passive radiator facing forwards, with the main driver facing downwards, or perhaps visa/versa. Will this work well with these drivers? Perhaps the passive will not be able to be tuned properly with weights if it is facing downwards? Perhaps the main driver will not like facing downwards either? The other alternative is to have the driver and the passive on opposite sides of the cube. Opinions please? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I thought that I should mention that initially these are to be used with some Fostex FX120 fullrangers in MLTL cabs.
The crossover on the plate amp can be between 170hz and 40hz. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
somewhat different parameters ? http://www.bkelec.com/HiFi/Drive_Units/Alcone/bx10.htm http://www.bkelec.com/HiFi/Drive_Units/Alcone/bx10p.htm and here : http://www.hifisound.de/oxid/oxid.ph...-COATED-PAPER/ I estimate you will need to ~ double the PR's mass. I'd say both should be mounted vertical, keep the BX10 magnet away from any transformers, make sure they do not foul the amplifier. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Wow
BK Electronics: £49.30 Lautspreckershop: E119 Hifisound: E169 I think that I paid £60 for a BX10, with a passive radiator, and postage included, so not too bad. It is nice to see that us Brits are not being ripped off for once. Sreten: I suspected that these units need to be vertical. Can anyone else confirm this? Also, if I am going to crossover at higher fequencies (up to 170hz is possible), now, or in the future, the main driver will need to face foward; yes? What is the minimum distance that should separate a driver from the transformer in the plate amp? I had not considered this (apart from working physically). See photos: (large transformer) ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Vikash has his passive facing downwards in this :http://www.vikash.info/audio/xls10/design.asp
Comments? This seems the perfect solution for me, assuming my passive radiator is suitable for downfiring. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
|
I've always had it positioned sideways so both drivers are vertical.
I really should update that page...
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.) |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
BK Electronics uses this Passive Radiator facing downwards.
This is good enough encouragement for me, so I am going to give it a go. If you think about the mechanics of a PR, perhaps this is the best way to go? Thanks for your help. I will keep you posted... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| driver placement | speedie | Multi-Way | 4 | 9th August 2009 04:22 AM |
| Driver placement in horn? | Rademakers | Multi-Way | 4 | 3rd June 2008 10:58 PM |
| Bass Exciter build | dublin78 | Subwoofers | 1 | 25th September 2007 01:10 PM |
| BIB DRIVER PLACEMENT n' others | herpaw | Full Range | 18 | 27th December 2006 08:53 AM |
| Driver placement | Vivek | Multi-Way | 8 | 12th April 2002 07:58 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10582 seconds (79.15% PHP - 20.85% MySQL) with 10 queries |