Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th July 2008, 02:34 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default dipole woofers for Maggies

I tried this post in the audio asylum. Got lots of agreement, but not specific plans. Maybe you DIY'ers have tried this and would be willing to share your ideas. I have tried several subwoofers to give more "punch" to my Maggie 20.1 system, but all have been of the closed box design--ported or sealed--and I could never get them to integrate well with my planars. Didn't really get more "punch" either. Right now, I am biamping my Maggies and the sound I am getting now is the best yet. But I would STILL LIKE A MORE DYNAMIC BASS. So, maybe I'm going at it wrong. How about an OB design with six 8" woofers per side to be placed alongside the Maggies. This would make the Maggies act like "wings," thus extending the bass. Also, an OB array should mimic the way the planars launch a wave front, possiby lending more coherence to the overall sound. Has anyone done this? Can you recommend drivers, xover, etc. ?
Thanks,
Chuck
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 08:21 AM   #2
Calvin is offline Calvin  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Calvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: close to Basel
Hi,

I won´t recommend a plain OB for this usage. Folded Dipole baffles are more promising. Styles could be U, A, N or W. Depending on the drivers parameters and the goal You are aiming at You can choose one of those cabinet styles. They all have the advantage of lesser suck-out at lower freqs than the OB, i.e. less equing needed. A-type and small versions of N- and W-type reduce the freeair resonace frequency of the drivers.
My favourites are the A- and the small N-type. The former if You want an easy to build cabinet and if You like to ´see´ the drivers. The latter with an exceptional small building width and usually the most lowering of Fs. With both types you can use drivers with ~5Hz higher Fs than the proposed Fb.
As drivers You can use longthrow types (>+-4mm) with progressive suspensions. The moving system shouldn´t be heavy (<40gr for a 8" driver). Fs beeing ~30Hz-40Hz. The Qt shouldn´t be low (>0.4 - <0.8)
A nice example is the Peerless SLS8.

jauu
Calvin
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
16 Ohm dipole woofers on Ebay Magnetar Multi-Way 3 29th November 2007 03:32 PM
No EQ. (gain) Dipole woofers.. ScottG Multi-Way 0 2nd November 2006 10:18 PM
NHT woofers in dipole. al2002 Multi-Way 4 27th March 2006 03:41 PM
suitable dipole mid-woofers smak Multi-Way 21 4th January 2004 07:34 PM
Has anybody used the Peerless SLS woofers in a dipole? capslock Multi-Way 1 15th December 2003 11:42 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Page generated in 0.07987 seconds (60.63% PHP - 39.37% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio