|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
9th June 2008, 03:00 AM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto
|
Peerless XLS 12" in Shadow Cabinet...
I have a few of these drivers available for sub duty and rather than building a passive radiator loaded box I figured since I'll be going all Fostex FE126E's in either Harvey or Saburo cabinets a BVR would also fit here for bottom end. Now I understand the cabinet was intended for a driver with slightly higher Q in the CSS driver but would the intended design still work with the low Q of the XLS. Inquiring minds would like to know.....
Take care.
__________________
What was that?... I can't hear you I have a line array filling my ears. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Peerless 850146 "replacement" 830668 | fat_terry | Multi-Way | 13 | 24th January 2007 03:03 AM |
| AUDAX speaker, with "special" sealed cabinet | arcturus | Multi-Way | 1 | 27th September 2005 07:56 PM |
| Peerless XXLS 12" DVC (830837)- replacement for PE Dayton 12" DVC 295-185? | tktran | Subwoofers | 2 | 14th August 2005 02:04 PM |
| What is "compliance" a driver or cabinet? | andy2 | Multi-Way | 4 | 26th November 2004 04:40 PM |
| Newbie question re: "Proper" cabinet design | Ken C | Multi-Way | 5 | 8th June 2004 07:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
