|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Ok i want an enclosure for two Volt B2500.1's link to specs
A sealed doesn't really give enough low freq response. I've had a play with TL's and its seemingly impossible to do one for two drivers. (without having them side by side). I've ben playing with winisd to get a ported design. Now i'd like to steer away from the trates of typical ported "boom" boxs and have minimal group delay, port noise and excursion whilst retaining a fairly flat freq response. The two boxes i have come up with are: Yellow = Sealed Red = 1.046 cuft tuned to 29.5 Hz Blue = 1.343 cuft tuned to 34.75 Hz ![]() Now the freq response of the blue is slightly better. But the red one has better group delay, port velocity and cone excursion. My only worries are that these are way different to the suggested enclosures. Do they seem alright to you guys, and would you suggest anything different? Regards Pete |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I would go with the red curve. Don't worry, your design is not actually off the manufacturers mark, see they specify designs from 20 litres to 70 litres. Yours simply falls inbetween the three alignments they chose to present.
PS hi
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
b 1(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Quote:
Me and many others have been satisfied that choosing a point along the line and then using it as the acoustic mean to place the drivers vertically above/below since it seems reasonable that they would average out 'good enough' and IIRC MJK proved it mathematically awhile back for the skeptics. After all, what's the difference between two separate sources or one oblong one WRT pipe action? Just so we're clear, this doesn't apply to drivers positioned as you originally considered, only to drivers closely coupled, i.e. butted up against each other. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Oh i see.
i didn't consider that putting them very close would act like as though they were at a single point. Seems pretty sensible though... thanks for that Pete |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Switching car audio enclosure to home enclosure | wattz | Subwoofers | 10 | 18th April 2010 05:51 PM |
| Comparison of Volt B2500.1, B250.8, RV3143 and S/S 25W8565-01 | jheoaustin | Multi-Way | 58 | 8th January 2009 04:25 PM |
| Switching 230 Volt Transformer to 120 Volt | OMNIFEX | Parts | 10 | 6th April 2008 04:34 PM |
| 9 volt DC to 48V DC | Ricren | Parts | 12 | 19th October 2004 08:02 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11385 seconds (69.35% PHP - 30.65% MySQL) with 11 queries |