Hornresp

Ok so I made BP6, TH and PH3 as close as I could without decimals.
BP6:
1714073807155.png

1714073824115.png


PH3:
1714073866533.png

1714073908405.png


TH with a rear chamber as the stub and throat adapter and port as the rear chamber:
1714073984996.png

1714074005753.png


So TH and PH3 look pretty similar and both have a tuning around 26/58, but BP6 still has a lower tune of about 24/51Hz, and all of them are 316l +-0.5l.
So it must be the stub between the cone and front chamber that raises the tuning because it is simulated in both TH and PH3, but not BP6.
 
So TH and PH3 look pretty similar and both have a tuning around 26/58, but BP6 still has a lower tune of about 24/51Hz, and all of them are 316l +-0.5l.

The attached PH1, PH3, BP6S and TH designs all have the same 27.2 Hz fundamental frequency. I will leave it to you to work out why :).

(The port tube lengths in the BP6S design have been shortened to take into account the automatically-added end corrections).
 

Attachments

  • Attach_8.png
    Attach_8.png
    16.1 KB · Views: 5
  • Attach_7.png
    Attach_7.png
    15.9 KB · Views: 5
  • Attach_6.png
    Attach_6.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 5
  • Attach_5.png
    Attach_5.png
    16.1 KB · Views: 5
  • Attach_4.png
    Attach_4.png
    16.4 KB · Views: 5
  • Attach_3.png
    Attach_3.png
    15.3 KB · Views: 5
  • Attach_2.png
    Attach_2.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 5
  • Attach_1.png
    Attach_1.png
    15.3 KB · Views: 5
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user