Hornresp

[NEO Dan]

Originally Posted by AndrewT

Where does Re and Le and TH fit into the order?

Tab tab tab... Hornresp knows.

[AndrewT]

thank you.

[Thawach]

hi david , please see this pic on the top. the design i want 100-1500 hz . david im worry a little i will loss the some high frequency ? when i bend like the pic. thanks

[David McBean]

Originally Posted by NEO Dan

When in doubt use the tab key...

Alternatively, the Enter key can be used. To move in the reverse direction, use Shift+Tab. The Up and Down arrow keys can also be used to navigate the Hornresp input fields.

Kind regards,

David

[David McBean]

Originally Posted by Thawach

david im worry a little i will loss the some high frequency ?

Hi Thawach,

It is difficult to comment - the high frequency performance will be affected by the driver characteristics and horn dimensions.

Kind regards,

David

[AndrewT]

Originally Posted by David McBean

Alternatively, the Enter key can be used. To move in the reverse direction, use Shift+Tab. The Up and Down arrow keys can also be used to navigate the Hornresp input fields.

This implies that a different order of entry for the data can be used.

What is the "best" data entry order?

[Silent Screamer]

Is there anyway to take the M bump out of the graph?
I tried varying all the box parameters but I just could get rid of the hump.
Side note can that reading be improved?

[mwmkravchenko]

You have the classic two bump tapped horn. To smooth that out you need to alter the path length and or the woofer location along the path.

Both will alter the response and the efficiency.

Use the wizard, the best thing David ever added to the program. Move the sliders around that control the correct parameters and you will stumble upon the response that your after.

Then you will have to make the compromises necessary to get the enclosure size you can live with.

[tb46]

Hi Silent Screamer,

Post #2697

Try double-clicking on Sd while in the Edit mode, this will give you the T/S parameters. Are they correct? And, why an Rg of 4 Ohms?

Regards,

[bjorno]

.....And why a Rms value of 0.83 ?

b