|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Hi,
I'm starting my first subwoofer, after many weeks research and reviewing a number of designs I have decided on using the Peerless XXLS 830845 12" Subwoofer for in a sealed design. The subwoofer will be powered by a Redgum Audio RGSW4 Subwoofer Amplifier Plate which is 600WRMS power output into 8 ohms / 900WRMS into 4 ohms with an Electronic Crossover adjustable from 20Hz to 200Hz. http://www.redgumaudio.com/store/99.html Going from the specifications on the DST website it recommends a seal box volume of 62L, I've come accross a number of other designs using a volume of 74L. Unfortantely I'm not very good with the winISD applications. Most of the designs only seem to use about 300RMS of power, I thought it would be better to get a bigger amplifier just in case I decided to change the design in the future. I know that ported applications are better for movies, but since its my first subwoofer a simple design is probally better. What you guys think? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
Hi,
Sealed may not give enough low bass to satisfy (though I am a big fan of sealed, I know it's limits). Any bass boost on the amp? This would help. Better to have more than enough amp power than not enough (clipping kills). Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
True, I am aware that Sealed has its limits.
The only other option was a 830500 12" XLS with a PR. http://www.tymphany.com/papers/appxls12b.htm |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: St Pete, Florida
|
You know, you can save yourself tons of money on the amp alone if you go with this one from PE. Not to mention that it has a ton more features, including full parametric bass EQ!
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/showd...number=300-808
__________________
Charles |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
the amp spec shows it is safe driving 4r0 loads but the power has drooped considerably. 69.3Vac into 8r0 (+36.8dbV). 60Vac into 4r0 (+35.6dbV). That shows a loss of 1.2dbV into the 4r0 load. A good amp that can deliver current into a difficult load will lose <1dbV into it's lowest recommended load. A very good amp <0.7dbV and an excellent amp <=0.5dbV. I recommend you stay with 8ohm speakers for this amplifier. 600W into 8ohm even if they are only 88db/W/m will produce a lot of bass. High senstivity PA style drivers will not produce much low bass they are optimised for music and produce massive volume down to about 40 to 50Hz. For low bass you are looking for 30Hz response and for sub-bass look at 20Hz response. Quote:
low bass is useful for movies. Judging by what I hear I think movie sound tracks apply less equalisation to the bass information than music. the result is that there is good unadulterated content down there that enhances the whole experience if the speakers are capable. Sealed can get down there if the somewhat complex design is properly carried out. Ported is probably easier and requires less Xmax if the tuning happens to suit the wanted low frequencies.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
Okay,
I think I have narrowed it down to: 1x 830500 XLS 1x 850548 PR 450W Redgum RSW3 Plate Amp http://www.redgumaudio.com/Brochures/rgsw3.htm Box Size 480mm x 480mm x 470mm What you think? |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tasmania, Australia
|
Hello Nick,
One thing I can say, is the Redgum amp... well is rather expensive. If you have the money and thats what your after, but there are better amps to be had for the money as far as I can see. Other than that, the Peerless sub & radiator are a good way to go. Your box dimensions, I assume thats the outer dimensions, what thickness board and I assume MDF yeah?
__________________
Darcher - Audio Visual - Computers |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
is a cube the best shape for a sub or bass speaker box? Or at these low frequencies is shape irrelevant?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
sfreak: I was going to use MDF yes and probally 1inch thick?
Yeah the Redgum amplifiers are not cheap, but they are a plate amp and its all ready to go. I was thinking of contacting Stones Studio to get an exact diagram for the box, costs about $100 AndrewT: Good question, not sure... Anyone? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| subwoofer under bed | Potato42 | Subwoofers | 7 | 13th January 2009 02:21 PM |
| subwoofer project, which subwoofer? | Davlaf | Subwoofers | 12 | 9th November 2006 03:59 AM |
| Subwoofer crossover / subwoofer module design | derMichi | Subwoofers | 4 | 20th April 2006 10:31 AM |
| how to connect a non powered subwoofer to a stereo system without a subwoofer output | JSD777 | Multi-Way | 4 | 20th September 2005 03:19 PM |
| I need help with subwoofer deisign: HUGE inexpensive subwoofer | hottyson | Subwoofers | 16 | 4th May 2004 03:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10868 seconds (80.48% PHP - 19.52% MySQL) with 10 queries |