|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bologna
|
Hello,
Peerless sls-10 http://www.lautsprechershop.de/pdf/peerless/sls10.pdf 93 liter ported enclosure with 10cm diameter x 19,7 port, heavly filled with absorbing material. I will use it with two bookshelf speaker(72hz -3db) for music. Is it a good enclosure for this driver? and most of all is a good driver? thank you |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
You would be better telling us what frequency it's tuned to, it's too hard to guess from the port and box size.
I wouldn't heavily stuff a ported box, it prevents the port doing it's thing. IMO it won't sound brilliant as your box is bigger than Vas and the driver has pretty high Qts.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Leeds, UK
|
It's not really suited to a vented box, Qts is too high.
The alignment you've suggested will give about a 1.5db peak centred on 50Hz, also you will only be able to feed it about 10w before it starts bottoming out. 84L sealed will give you a Q of 0.707, f3 in the mid 40's and much higher potential power handling |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bologna
|
it's tuned to 30,91hz. I meand the box is heavy filled, while the port is slightly filled.
look ![]() yes you have 1.4db peak but around 70/75hz so at the crossover frequency. and 1.7db peak at 50hz but all coud be reduced by slightly filling the port. There's no problem for excursion at 80W it within the limit. And damping the driver basket I think lower the qts. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
|
__________________
moray james |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bologna
|
do you know a software for ripole design?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
|
I can send you cabinet details along with filter data specifically for the SLS 12 Peerless.
__________________
moray james |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bologna
|
but I need it for SLS-10. Since I have this driver in hands. Anyway sls12 looks similar... thank you
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
|
moray j at telus dot net
__________________
moray james |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Quote:
this is not a sub woofer, its just a woofer, sealed will give u a quick and tight responce, small size, i think ported enclosures are good only for freq. below 100hz (sub-woofers). BTW are you planing to use any tweeter with this driver for high range, if yes wats the cuf-off freq. u planing to have |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| peerless xxls sealed -vs- peerless xls with passive radiator | Naudio | Subwoofers | 8 | 23rd March 2008 09:00 PM |
| Peerless SLS 400 | 4real | Multi-Way | 12 | 26th October 2005 05:37 PM |
| WTB:Peerless | bhg41088 | Swap Meet | 1 | 6th July 2004 10:41 PM |
| Whats the difference between the Peerless 831916 and Peerless 850122 | SkinnyBoy | Multi-Way | 9 | 12th June 2003 03:11 PM |
| Peerless | Vivek | Parts | 10 | 23rd June 2001 11:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09935 seconds (76.11% PHP - 23.89% MySQL) with 11 queries |