Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Dayton RSS265HF-4  vs Tang Band WT-1427B
Dayton RSS265HF-4  vs Tang Band WT-1427B
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th August 2007, 07:31 AM   #1
jetty2 is offline jetty2  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default Dayton RSS265HF-4 vs Tang Band WT-1427B

Hi,

I would like to know if anybody has compared these two together. I am building Zaph BAMTM and was thinking of using TB, which is cheaper.

Responses are highly appreciated.

Jetty2
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2007, 02:55 PM   #2
gtforme00 is offline gtforme00  United States
diyAudio Member
 
gtforme00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
I have not used either of these, but I do have 4 of the RSS315HF, the big brother to the RSS265HF.

The primary difference between the drivers would be the lower non-linear distortion of the Dayton motor. The RSS series have very low distortion and have well designed motors.

The Dayton has 14mm xmax, compared to the TB's 9.5mm, but you probably won't need all that xmax anyways.

The Dayton has a cast frame, the TB is stamped steel. Not the biggest issue, but the Dayton would likely have less mechanical noise at high excursions.

Claimed efficiency is similar, but I would not put alot of weight into comparing efficiencies amongst different manufacturers.

When you get down to it, they are very different drivers. The TB has one very interesting feature and that is it's shallow mounting depth. If this feature is not needed, I would not recommend it over the less expensive and (likely) lower distortion Peerless SLS 830668. Available at Madisound.

Which brings me to my recommendations. For a good, inexpensive, low distortion woofer the 830668 is a good buy. If you are trying to stay at the partsexpress website for the free shipping, and aren't as concerned about the distortion, I've used the 10" Quattro QT255-4 with good results in the past. It's on special for $50 right now. I'm not saying that the TB is a bad woofer. I just think that you pay a premium for the low mounting depth that could be spent on a higher quality woofer if the depth is not an issue.

Best Regards,
David
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Dayton RSS265HF-4  vs Tang Band WT-1427BHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tang Band W3-593SF vs. Tang Band W3-926SD Zaputh Full Range 17 6th June 2009 12:37 AM
Tang Band W5-704D + Dayton PT2C 69stingray Multi-Way 12 4th March 2008 03:23 PM
Tang Band WT-1427B 10" Neo Subwoofer JimOfOakCreek Swap Meet 5 28th February 2008 08:27 AM
My Tang Band WT-1427B Project JimOfOakCreek Subwoofers 2 7th February 2008 10:27 PM
Dayton RSS265HF-4 4real Multi-Way 7 21st September 2005 07:15 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.79%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki