Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd August 2007, 11:36 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Default Floral or memory foam best?

Which would be better at fooling mother nature WRT enclosure volume the floral open cell foam used for flower arrangements or the memory foam mattress pads? Put another way which would have the greater effect on total system Q?

mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2007, 03:41 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
gtforme00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Try blowing into each material. You might get some odd looks for doing this! You ideally want a material that does not suffocate you, but provides reasonable restriction of air propagation. Pillow stuffing (known as dacron, polyester, and other names), stuffed appropriately might have more predictable results.

I have not tried the foams and am not an authority on the subject. I would be interested to know what you find! It would be interesting to measure the resonance frequency and Q of the enclosure with different materials.

I imagine that many air filter materials would also provide a similar function.

Regards,
David
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2007, 03:54 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
If I understand your question correctly, I don't think either material will give you the results you seek.
They willl exhibit different rates of frequency absorption but not change system Q. You want a material that changes mechanical energy into heat energy which requires the material actually be able to move. Polyester and/or fiberglass fibers have this quality. A stationary foam does not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2007, 09:07 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
Default Friction is the key...

I have no hands on experience with memory foam and have no idea if it is open cell Fine pour open cell structure foam is what you want.
With fiberous material the fibers vibrate and rub together and the friction generates heat. So acoustical vibration is turned into heat and energy is dissipated. With open cell foam it is the friction of the air as it passes through the foam's cells which generate the heat and so damps. I replaced the long fiber wool in a set of ATC two way cabinets with Pearl Lite (heat expanded rock) used normally for plant soil. The difference was easily noticable with the Pearl Lite sounding much better. Bass was deeper and more controlled and there was a marked improvement in the midrange clairity along with enhanced detail. Everything sounded smoother more relaxed yet more dynamic at the same time.
You need to sift Pearl Lite to seperate the largest pieces (about the size of a rice crispy) from the small bits and the fine dust particles. Once sifted you can install it in a cabinet but you must insure that it only goes where you want it to and that it cannot get into any open back drivers. This is a fuss but it can be done and the material works very well and is much cleaner to work with than activated charcoal as KEF have used.
__________________
moray james
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2007, 10:13 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
I understand your point Moray but is using a material to change system Q in a subwoofer the same as using a material to damp high frequencies in a full range speaker?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007, 05:16 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
Default damping is damping....

different materials will have different absorption qualities but for the most part I think that what is of most concern is damping the driver near or at the resonant point of the box and driver combined. Higher frequency damping can be achieved with fiberous curtains and other such methods. I do think that Pearl Lite or activated charcoal come to about as perfect a method as there is given that they both are a PITA to use.
__________________
moray james
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007, 12:29 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Timn8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
I guess what I'm having difficulty with is not so much the type of material but how it is to be applied. The exception would be the Temperpedic foam which I think is too dense for this purpose but might work as a vibration damper.
I can't imagine trying to come up with the correct amount and application of florist foam or dealing with rocks. I suppose you could make a sort of pillow with Perlite though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007, 11:39 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
I am following your replies with interest. I was given to understand that the use of an open cell foam increased the apparent size of the enclosure so I am trying to get a handle on which versions (both of these are open cell foams I believe) would provide the greatest effect.

mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2007, 11:53 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
Default This should max you out....

http://www.kef.com/kefamerica/technology/pdfs/acewp.pdf
__________________
moray james
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2007, 05:27 PM   #10
Petriej is offline Petriej  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
A friend of mine works at a warehouse that moves all kinds of merchandise. He told me a crate fell and busted open so they couldn't use what was in it. He asked me if I wanted it and I said sure. Here's what's inside:

Hearos

So I have a couple thousand of these things. Can I put them in my subwoofer box?






__________________
Signature:
Optional signature you may use to appear at bottom of your signatures.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LCR and of course Memory Resistor impsick Parts 2 3rd May 2008 08:30 AM
Foam, thicker foam or Open Cell qguy Subwoofers 4 11th March 2007 07:06 PM
Notebook Memory eag Swap Meet 4 24th April 2006 04:20 AM
Speaker damping: Foam or expanding foam akunec Multi-Way 2 16th September 2005 06:26 PM
Memory distortion, crap or serious? Pjotr Everything Else 15 11th March 2004 05:48 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Page generated in 0.10463 seconds (81.31% PHP - 18.69% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio