Affordable subwoofer - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th January 2003, 09:09 AM   #1
jtriggs is offline jtriggs  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Default Affordable subwoofer

Hi,

I live in Sydney, Australia and recently purchased a 5 speaker surround package with Sony amp: http://www.dse.com.au/cgi-bin/dse.st...product/A2633S

Overall I am pretty happy with the sound, except when I ran some THX tests I realised the bass response below 100Hz is pretty poor. I started looking at building my own subwoofer, but am a bit confused on which is the best way to go.

I would like to only spend about A$300 - A$400. It would be used mostly for movies, but also music. In general, I prefer better quality than loud volume. So now for the questions:

1) If I build a sub am I likely to get it right the first time if the calculations look OK on paper? Or am I better off getting something like the Sony SA-WM40?

2) Considering the fronts are 50W, surrounds 30W and centre 40W, what power subwoofer will I need?

3) Are there any good sites that can step me through the whole process, i.e. from choosing the drivers, designing and then building the box?

Any other suggestions on where to start would be much appreciated.

Thanks

James
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2003, 11:30 AM   #2
subwo1 is offline subwo1  United States
diyAudio Member
 
subwo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North American Continent
Hello. You should build your own.

A sealed enclosure is the way to go. I believe it offers advantages which cannot be outweighed by other methods.

Make the enclosure small so that construction is easiest for a solid box. I suggest using two 8" high-excursion subwoofer drivers in a 1 to 2 cubic foot box. Don't be concerned about low end roll-off, there is plenty of cone excursion capability to permit the of use active equalization to give full response (down to 30Hz-40Hz).

Use speaker design software to optimize the box size for the drivers. Obtain drivers with a Qts figure no higher than 0.4. Much higher figures result in muddy response. Put lots of damping material in the box. You can obtain some bed pillows and remove the stuffing to use inside the box.

You should use an amplifier capable of putting out at least 200 watts of peak power for good results. You can obtain free software programs which can produce a full spectrum of sine waves to get your active equalization settings close to where you want them. You may like the idea of using an automobile amp/equalizer combination. The more equalization adjustments you have at differing frequencies in the subwoofer band the better the results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2003, 10:02 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
You might want to read the article linked below. It has a nice step-by-step description of how to build an inexpensive sealed sub. I don't know if Apex ships to Australia, or whether comparable parts are readily available there, but the description of the process ought to be valuable.

DIY Sub Article
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2003, 11:23 PM   #4
Peter M is offline Peter M  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA
http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/Seal...plications.PDF

An 88 L sealed and stuffed enclosure and a 100-250 W amp should do you well without EQ.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2003, 05:45 PM   #5
Ilianh is offline Ilianh  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Ilianh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Ilianh
Many people prefer to use vented designs in home theaters,

Get a program like Winisd and play around with different drivers you know, check the frequency response plot and phase plot and such.

Go around in stores, and hear how vented sounds and how sealed designs sound, sealed subwoofers are not as available as vented ones, but I've seen some.

Vented subwoofers can sound very good for movies.
No wonder most of the subwoofers made for home theaters are vented..
__________________
Time is the best teacher; unfortunately, it kills all its students
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2003, 07:18 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
The big benefit to a vented design is better response in the 20-30 Hz range. But they are bigger, harder to do well and less forgiving of mistakes. A sealed design will generally produce better results in the frequency range that it covers, and it's easier to get right. Given his priorities, experience, and budget, a sealed design seems like a better way to go.

I have a DIY sealed subwoofer, and the only thing I ever miss are the full force of explosions in action movies. In return, I get exceptional bass quality from 30-something Hz up to 80, and I spent only about $500 US to get it. I have a song on one of my CDs that I always use when auditioning speakers. It has some really low, crystal clear, lingering bass notes. That song sounds lousy on most speakers under $3500. It does sound good on B&W 803's, which cost $5000. And it sounds at least as good on my system, with my mid-fi Pioneer Elite receiver, $500 DIY subwoofer, and $1000/pr North Creek kit speakers. So I have no complaints about my sealed subwoofer, especially where music is concerned.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2003, 11:16 AM   #7
jtriggs is offline jtriggs  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Thanks for all the info so far. I have been doing a lot of browsing and learning in the last couple of days. At this stage I have decided on a sealed box, 12" woofer and a 250W amp. I wil use internal bracing like the Adire 88.5L sealed cabinet. Time for a few more questions:

1) When stuffing the box, should the internal walls also be covered in some material? If so what is best?

2) When calculating box volume, do you need to take into account the volume used by the internal bracing and the speaker? What about the stuffing? Are there any rules of thumb such as 1kg stuffing increases box volume by ???L

3) Are there any other T/S parameters other than a Qts < 0.4 that I should be looking for? I believe I should also be looking for a low Fs and a high Xmax. Anything else?

4) I understand the Gain and SPL plots in WinISD, but what do the Phase plot and group delay graphs mean? Is it correct that the "tighter bass" people speak about is signified by a flatter and smaller group delay? What driver parameters or box size variables result in a lower and flatter group delay?

5) Do box dimensions make any difference or is it only the box volume? (I know not to use a cubic box)

6) What do I need to look for to know if the driver can be mounted facing down? (This appears to be the best mounting method)

7) An active EQ will obviously improve the frequency response, but what about the cleanness / tightness of the base? Will it introduce any side effects?

8) Does anyone know of a good place to get drivers in Sydney, Australia?

Thanks for all the help. I am already starting to dream about the rumbles!
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2003, 11:40 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Send a message via MSN to SkinnyBoy
I'm happy with my 10inch el'cheapo Subwoofer with a 65watt amp... It seems to give better bass than the main speakers (with 12inch woofers) Its not all that clear, but what can you expect for $35?? The total cost including the box was about $60... I'm not complaining.. Perhaps you could look at the Jaycar isobaric subwoofer? Its a vented enclosure, but you can buy a kit so you don't need to design the box, just assemble it.. it uses a 50 litre box (I think) and only a 150watt amplifier for 2 12 inch woofers... Go to your local jaycar, and ask to hear it.. Costs about $700 Australian (I think) lol, very much thinking going on today.. lol Ohh, and that includes an amplifier.. lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2003, 12:53 PM   #9
Peter M is offline Peter M  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA
1) Yes. Polyfill and fiberglass insulation work well.

2) Yes, no, and yes.

http://www.integracaraudio.com/carau...ces/fiberfill/

3) Yes; Pe, Sd, Vd, Vas, and efficiency numbers are all good to look at.

4) Yes; http://www.adireaudio.com/tech_papers/sub_gd.htm

Box volume has an effect on GD at different frequencies. I'm not familiar with the T/S parameters that directly affect GD - perhaps motor strength?

5) Only box volume. Feel free to make a cube - standing waves won't be an issue.

6) http://www.adireaudio.com/tech_paper...rientation.htm

If 100gCmsMms/Xmas<5, you're set.

7) I've never used EQ, but Siegfried Linkwitz seems to use it with great success.

http://www.linkwitzlab.com/xo_eq.htm

http://www.trueaudio.com/basslst2.htm

8) http://www.adireaudio.com/dealers/dealers.htm#A

The website seems to be down, but I'd talk to John Woodhead to see if he can ship a Shiva or something to you.

Hope this helps,

Peter
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2003, 10:49 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
I highly recommend the following - although they will blow your $500 budget....

I bought a Shiva from John Woodhead @ Acoustic concepts. Great service and delivery within 5 days (to NZ). Well packaged.
http://www.acousticconcepts.com.au

I also bought a plate amp from redgum audio. 300watts (It seems to push that xmax of the Shiva) - also well made. It goes flat to 0Hz (unlike some of the taiwanese amps I'm told which some start to rolloff from 35Hz or so down).http://www.redgumaudio.com

I built a dual purpose sealed / vented box - with a sealed Q of about 0.5. I need to damp the box though (sounds a bit muddy) and still needs breaking in.

I also braced the hell out of the box. Very rigid and heavy. I recommend anything bigger than 100L and you do the same. I also went with a 1.5" thick baffle.

I've only been allowed to test it in the garage - but it seems to create enough rattles in there!.

Looking forward to the finishing and putting inside.

Let us know what you decide.

David.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
affordable$$audio... Nanook Everything Else 7 1st August 2012 07:29 PM
Affordable transport? Shike Digital Source 3 29th August 2008 02:10 AM
affordable transformers for KT-88's namatjira Tubes / Valves 6 18th March 2008 11:35 AM
Affordable KT88 Simpleton Tubes / Valves 17 20th May 2006 12:56 AM
Affordable electrolytics bremen nacht Parts 8 2nd July 2004 11:12 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:23 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2