Binding Posts - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Commercial Sector > Vendor Forums > Sonic Craft

Sonic Craft Offering DIY Parts, Wire & Cable, and Mod Service.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th February 2013, 01:22 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
charliemb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Default Binding Posts

Regarding the Cardas CCBP heavy billet Copper binding post, this appears to
be unplated copper. Doesn't copper corrode long term?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 02:55 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Sometimes it does not take very long I never understood people using these, but some swear by them. A few have said that they let theirs turn and do nothing about it, and yet, they sound good Beauty is in the ear of the beholder. Some people do not want anything between them and their music. That includes plating on their binding posts. I suggest at least using a preservative like ProGold. This does protect them.

For me, I prefer the CCGR. Binding posts are a convention. They allow easy connection and disconnection. If you were the super puritan type, you would not use posts at all (as some have chose). You would hard wire the speaker. For the majority, the ones who use posts, why would you use a post that requires such care? Further, I prefer the sound of the CCGR over the CCBP. I find the CCBP a bit rolled. Perhaps it is the shear size of this solid conductor. Whatever the case, the Silver plate and Rhodium flash sounds better to me. Don't get me wrong, I do believe the Gold plate (CCGG) has its place if one will benefit from taming the highs or warming on the whole. However, these are subtle effects. The more refined the system, the more noticeable they are. But, I have listen to many systems where the differences would be utterly undetectable

Last edited by Jeff Glowacki; 1st March 2013 at 06:16 AM. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 03:03 AM   #3
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by charliemb View Post
Regarding the Cardas CCBP heavy billet Copper binding post,
I had the opportunity to work with these. They ae not very good IMO.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 04:18 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
What is your preference and why?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 04:45 AM   #5
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Eventually they were replaced with these for higher performance http://qcomponents.ca/product.php?pr...cat=115&page=1

An upgrade to the plugs in the cup: http://www.partsconnexion.com/product7483.html

If we what to go all out, the Eichmann: http://www.partsconnexion.com/product1873.html

The WBT next Gen look interesting, haven't tried them yet.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 06:53 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by planet10 View Post
Eventually they were replaced with these for higher performance Q-components

An upgrade to the plugs in the cup: http://www.partsconnexion.com/product7483.html

If we what to go all out, the Eichmann: http://www.partsconnexion.com/product1873.html

The WBT next Gen look interesting, haven't tried them yet.

dave
Surely you jest

I think he is looking for improvement. I can not completely make out what you are trying to convey due to your typos, but that is definitely headed in the wrong direction. The Goldwoods are total crap including their ferromagnetic hardware. The product in the second link is not much better than the first, and the CCBP is superior to them easily.

The Eichmann RCAs have their place, but the cablepods, not so good. Again, I find the CCBP better than the cablepods. However, I did have the cablepods on Sale for $55 per set for over four months. Why so long? Probably because too many people were buying the superior CCGR.

I have listened to the WBTs, not to mention I was a dealer, they are over priced "for what they are". And still, the CCGR sounds better IMO.

Assuming you have some actual experience with the CCBP, I can only deduce that their was some kind of problem. Further, your recommendations might be a bit too frugal for this conversation. However, I encourage you to check out our current specials. The Vampire BP-Hex is seriously cheap for being the best Brass metal based post I have heard.

BTW, I truly appreciated your participation in my forum whether I agree with your views, or not . However, as a moderator yourself in the Vendor Forums, I find it distasteful for you to have posted in my forum with links to one of my primary competitors. At the very least, I would have assumed you would have linked directly to a manufacturer. I believe diyAudio has some rules or concern regarding "conflicts of interest". In any event, please do not do this again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 07:58 AM   #7
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Glowacki View Post
I can not completely make out what you are trying to convey due to your typos
Sorry about that, i am renowned for my poor typing.

Quote:
The Goldwoods are total crap
They may be cheesy, but like many connectors, low price usually means less metal. What does it say about the Cardas that they sound better.

Quote:
The product in the second link is not much better than the first
You may not agree, but some do. I have seen these same posts on 5-10k amplifiers -- good ones.

BTW, one can make the Cardas sound better by completely removing the nuts on them (if you use bananas)

Quote:
superior CCGR
Fancy looking, and following in the male, "mine is bigger than yours" tradition, but i found their performance hugely underwhelming (i am being polite).

Quote:
you have some actual experience with the CCBP
A number of sets. On amps and speakers.

Quote:
your recommendations might be a bit too frugal for this conversation.
I am after all a frugal-phile(tm)


Quote:
However, as a moderator yourself in the Vendor Forums, I find it distasteful for you to have posted in my forum
I am a member 1st, if you do not see a cop smiley i am not a moderator. I am sorry i did not notice that this was a vendor forum (a common error by many members, there is no clear indication that separates the regular forum from the vendor forums), as the moderator on your forum you are free to delete my posts maybe you should). I am only passing on my experience.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 09:19 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Dave,

No problem. I hunt and peck, so I can not really say I type.

I have not always found low mass to be good.

I have seen much more expensive amps use those huge WBTs, and we both know what those sound like. The low copper content brass is not helping either. High priced audio gear is not exempt from poor sounding parts. If one were using bananas with their CCGRs, it would be reasonable to remove the binding nuts. If they were using CCGRs, I would hope they would use spades.

Most high-end amps and speakers that use cardas posts use the HCBP or ACBP....not good. And remember, I do not care for the CCBP.

Please express the actual sonic issues you noticed with the CCBP. Assuming it was not the HCBP or ACBP. Further, please compare it to what you hear with the cablepods. I find the cablepods very overpriced, and I am not even a Frugal-file

I will share this though. When I first started building speakers back in the 70s, I use to use long small stainless steel screws for terminals. I screwed them in from the inside, and double nutted them on the outside. It was cheap However, over time, I found the same thing I found with non-inductive resistors that use stainless end caps. Stainless sounds bad.

I asked for your opinion, and have no intention of deleting your post.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 10:17 AM   #9
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 5
The differences in sonics comes down to DDR.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2013, 10:22 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
I apologize for my lack of familiarity with the abbreviation "DDR". Could you please clarify?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dayton binding posts and binding plate diypass Multi-Way 10 5th January 2013 08:03 PM
Binding Posts ANDYLASER Swap Meet 5 26th June 2010 12:14 AM
Binding Posts herm Multi-Way 7 14th February 2004 06:34 AM
Binding posts cp642 Parts 6 16th November 2001 03:10 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:14 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2