|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lake Tahoe, NV
|
Glen,
I hope this is not too picky. But, it seems to me that your input network (R2, C3//R3) will start to roll-off at ~13KHz. If you are my age; it probably doesn't matter! Interesting circuit; thanks for sharing it and your developmental perturbations. I am sorry that you felt it necessary not to keep posted the intermediate circuits. Best Wishes, VSR |
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
G'day sherelec. Thanks for the compliments. C3 'sees' R2 in parallel with the series combination of R1, C1+C2 and the output impedance of the audio source. Unless driven from a source with an unusually high output impedance, the frequency roll off will be well above 200kHz. This is done to suppress RFI. Cheers, Glen |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
Good luck
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
Link doesn't work!
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
I don't understand since I click on YOUR reply to my post and it works! May someone else could confirm? |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sweden--> Here
|
It works..
__________________
Regards Åke |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
I get this: The page cannot be displayed There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please try the following: Open the www.ne.jp home page, and then look for links to the information you want. Click the Refresh button, or try again later. Click Search to look for information on the Internet. You can also see a list of related sites. HTTP 500 - Internal server error Internet Explorer It could just be the ISP I'm on at the moment. I'll try from my computer at home tonight. BTW, I didn't copy the idea from somwehere else, but I'll be surprised if it hasn't been done before, since it is so simple. That's part of the reason why I'm openly posting it here - to find out. |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
|
I got the link. The sublimeness of fully balanced topologies - I love it.
Some good ideas to overcome the points with this type of design raised by Glen at the start of the thread. I tried this (but without specific circuitry to keep the VAS's in balance) about 2 years ago, and got great simulation results but not in practice. I will have to give it a try again. One point to note is that the value of the VAS emitter degenration resistors is quite critical and linked to the VAS/LTP current ratios as someone already pointed out. Too high and you get a nasty kink in the bode plot (pole-zero pair? - someone help me out here). I guess if you can get this fully balanced, current mirror driven VAS right, because of the f/back available, it may make distortion null circuity a bit supurfluous. One question I have to ask though, is will the forced imbalance in the mirror not lead to increased distortion. Look forward to your findings Glen. |
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
G'day Bonsai. My 'figure B' circuit (post 14) doesn't effect the balance of the current mirror. In my final circuit (post 17) the currents from Q3 & Q4 only flow through R22 and R25. This establishes a quiescent voltage drop across R22 and R25 of 2.4V each, forcing a rather stable 10mA quiescent current in the VA stages. Consider the circuit node at the base of Q23. Q19 mirrors the collector current of Q12. In the quiescent state, Q19 ‘sources’ 2.5mA (half the LTP tail current) to the base of Q23, while Q11 ‘sinks’ 2.5mA from the base of Q23. The VAS biasing current from Q3 has nowhere else to flow, but through the VAS biasing resistor R22. R22 also forms the collector load for the LTP, establishing the stage gain in conjunction with the LTP's emitter degeneration resistors. Cheers, Glen |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| mini aleph VS gainclone VS Class D amp | ecl86 | Pass Labs | 3 | 23rd June 2007 05:20 PM |
| M61571AFP,50W 5.1ch CLASS D mini amp projects | digi01 | Class D | 8 | 8th September 2004 09:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |