|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
hello, I want to know if this differential couple is calculated well.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ruda lšska // Poland
|
how much are +vcc and -vcc ?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
+45V -45V
and +25V -25V |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
there are two circuits; but, the resistors don´t change... or yes?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
sorry! there are two POWER SUPPLY, for the same circuit. I have to change the resistors if the supply change? if yes, how can I do this? sorry the mistakes! |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Current in R3 depends on -Vcc and would be different asuming you want the same Ic bias, as for the collectors, they are the dependent current source and not dependent on Vcc, except maybe Cco(collector to base/emitter capacitance) since it is not cascoded. If you replace R3 with a CCS(constant current source) it should make no difference with diffent supply rails.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun...... |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ruda lšska // Poland
|
yes it will be good
but we don't say you a values of resistors if you don't show full scheme |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi CBS240
Need your advice. Can I used the circuit with CCS to be used as input balanced to output unbalanced converter? What is the max. input level that it can substained. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Quote:
Yes, using a slight modification, the current is determained by Vbe(0.6V)/R2. The 100pF cap is to prevent occilations. Now there is a current source instead of a resistor feeding the emitters of the diff. You can see that in the case of the resistor, as the + input voltage increases, the - input voltage must also increase from feedback in order to balance the differential. The emitters of the diff will follow this voltage in an attempt to maintain common mode operation. Therefore the changing input voltage then shows up across the resistor(R3 in the figure from post 1). Since the bias current is determained from voltage across this resistor, bias current will change as well. The CCS presents a very high impeadance to any current above the set Iq to load the emitters so the voltage changing doesn't affect the bias current and thus improves CMRR as well as PSRR. I added an example of a J-fet CCS as well, it is even simpler.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun...... |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| JLH with a differential input stage | mohan72 | Solid State | 46 | 10th September 2008 07:59 PM |
| Adding a third input to a differential input stage? | maudio | Solid State | 15 | 11th October 2006 02:16 AM |
| Differential input stage | Dynsdale | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 3rd September 2005 07:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11349 seconds (80.51% PHP - 19.49% MySQL) with 11 queries |