|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
I need a low power PNP BJT which will work at only 0.7V Vce and Ic 2.5mA.
It must have low cob, over 200 hfe at 1V Vce and very high ft and very low noise. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Good old bc560c?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hi Mike,
I already use bc560c (you know were) but it has a big problem. It has very unstable hfe with temperature, so unstable that it can't keep bias stable when cold air is blow over it. ps Did you receive my e-mail with PowerSymasym EGLE files? Mihai |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: near london
|
Hi
You have probably already thought of this but here goes. All I do with the BC 550 and BC 560 is to press them against a common heat sink to keep the temperature low and constant. My "special " transistor for preamps and low noise is the lm394 ( in a can ) which does may meet all your needs but it is excellant. Don |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
all silicon transistors have a similar Ic vs Vbe characteristic that varies markedly with junction temperature. I think hFE has the same variation with temp. These variations are normally reduced by using an LTP to balance out changes. Even better balance is achieved by thermally coupling the devices and better still with a dual device.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton area, Alberta
|
Perhaps if we could see your circuit we could suggest modifications to make the bias less device dependant.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Ok, this is my amplifier.
R12 and R13 is no longer in circuit |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ruda lıska // Poland
|
i think if you connect q8 and q9 that will resolve your problem
i think the bias stability will rise if you connect together q16 + q14; q7 + q6 + q15 i think you could even connect transistors in first differential stage, j1 + j2, q21 + q18 |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Roender,
what is D1? a Zener or a 1mA CCS? your output stage currents seem astray. 70mA through R5 generates 1.54V. The bias across the emitter resistors will be about (1.54-1.3)=0.24V this generates Iq=2.4A. Reduce Ir5 to about 61mA and the bias reduces to about 420mA , Vre~=21mV. Iq=2*[(22r*0.07A)-1.3V]/(0r1*2) Note how sensitive Iq is to small changes in Ir5. How will you adjust Vbias? 4diodes will not achieve accuracy. Are any on the output heatsink for temperature compensation? You have cascoded the second LTP and achieved good HF response then killed that response by fiiting a Miller comp cap. Why have you fitted C14 to the collector of q10 rather than the collector of Q16? Why have you fitted R12 & R13? Tomahauk, connect those transistors? Do you mean match their parameters?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
your choice of values for C19 & C21 produce RC time constants near 220mS. If you adopt the philosophy of setting the PSU RC to half an octave above this (330mS) then you are forced to adopt +-40mF/channel for 8ohm speakers and +-80mF/ch for 4ohm speakers. Is C19 in series with a DC blocking cap in your source? The combined RC of the input could usefully be reduced to 80mS and still retain good bass response. Then C21 can be reduced to 220uF and that allows smoothing to be reduced by half. The input filters should set the frequency response of you amp. All the internal circuitry should exceed the bandwidth of the filters by a margin, that you select.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High frequency noise | fraserh | Everything Else | 6 | 8th November 2008 04:35 AM |
| SWM Seeking JFET /w low noise + high Vp | aletheian | Solid State | 3 | 11th July 2007 12:18 PM |
| High(er)-voltage, low noise v-reg? | Khron | Power Supplies | 8 | 1st June 2007 11:54 AM |
| New ultralow noise, high BW op-amp from ADI | jackinnj | Solid State | 21 | 15th March 2007 08:30 PM |
| searching for high end analog to spdif 24 bit schematics | AmA | Parts | 1 | 8th September 2005 10:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10372 seconds (79.74% PHP - 20.26% MySQL) with 11 queries |