
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
2nd March 2007, 03:00 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW England

Mjl3281 Soar
I needed to plot the SOA curve for the MJL3281 to position a dualslope protection locus prior to the resistance values being determined.
To do this requires converting the two SOA loglog graph slopes given in the manufacturer’s data into a linear form. This is easy for the first slope (power limit) because it normally follows the law Ic=P/Vce. The secondary breakdown values are then tabulated from the law Ic=k(Vce)^n, with k and n determined from the SOA secondary breakdown slope. However, I noticed that for the MJL3281, the first power slope does not conform to Ic=P/Vce, but needed to be calculated using Ic=k(Vce)^n. Since I have seen articles written by respected authors which show this device as having a normal power curve, and also a differing break point to that given by the graph, I’m somewhat confused. As an aside, if I perform the same analysis on the MJL 4281 it shows excellent correlation (as a check, P/Vce is equivalent to kVce^n, when, of course, k=P and n=1). I’ve attached the relevant sheet that shows my respective curves for the MJL3281. Any comments, anyone?? Brian. 
2nd March 2007, 03:10 PM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders

Hi,
Email me if you would like to see Bensen's spreadsheet with protection locus added over the SOAR.
__________________
regards Andrew T. 
2nd March 2007, 07:49 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006

Hi Pingrs
I think you need to be careful about the latest SOA's from ON Semi. The curves are published for t=1s, not DC. There might be an error, but any time shorter than DC might also have a higher rating than the DC values. I use the ratings from the data sheet to construct the DC curve. The two numbers are 4A at 50V; below which I assume that the slope is 1; and 1A @ 100V at which the slope I take to be 2. You can construct the two lines from these assumptions to generate the DC SOA. As usual, a caveat in that this does not guarantee that ON Semi will actually support such a curve! cheers John 
8th March 2007, 02:14 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW England

John,
Thank you. Sorry for the delay in my appreciation of your reply. I've been trying to get OnSemi to come up with something, but they say their data for this > 10yr old device is no longer available. "1A @ 100V at which the slope I take to be 2." Where does this slope come from? A kind of average of other devices, or does it have a natural physical relationship somehow? The MJL4281, for example, is about 2.1, as far as my maths tells me. Regards, Brian. 
8th March 2007, 02:17 PM  #5 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW England

Andrew T,
Not forgetting my thanks to you, Andrew. Brian. 
8th March 2007, 09:48 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006

Hi Brian
I only have this figure from past device characteristics. It is a guide not a calculation. cheers John 
8th March 2007, 10:08 PM  #7 
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm

Brian
All you need in fact is to establish the nominal power rating of the device at 25 deg. cent. and then plot the secondary protection locus at the same temp. from the data sheet. No need to indulge in the selfflagellation of exponentiated terms: the info. is in plain view on the datasheet. You may then "derate" (adjust) the resulting linearlinear characteristic(s) according to the needs imposed by your thermal management (heatsinking). 
9th March 2007, 12:47 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NW England

Hi Mike,
Thank you. If I understand you correctly, I find deducing plot points from a loglog graph difficult to judge, I've tried. I decided a bit of self flagellation is good for the soul, so sought the maths to convert just two relatively easy ones. Your consideration for those nonEnglish speakers on this forum whose vocabulary may not encompass "derate" and "thermal management" is admirable. Regards, Brian. 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
MJL3281 / MJW3281 differences?  gmikol  Solid State  4  5th April 2008 04:39 PM 
MJL3281/1302  pinkmouse  Parts  8  6th June 2003 05:31 PM 
Cascode cct minimises SOAR requirements of output bipolars.  Circlotron  Solid State  10  12th February 2003 11:13 AM 
SOAR graphs, hyperbolas, joperators  Circlotron  Solid State  1  22nd June 2002 09:53 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 