|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
hi there!
mj series sounds better than 2n3055 And complementary, in a musical fidelity a100? I mean : can I upgrade with these transistors? what's the difference in sonic performances? thanks walter |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
what DC voltage is on the supply rails of the MF a100?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
From reading Mark Hennessy's page, the MJ15003/4 will drop right in and be a hell of a lot more reliable than the remarked MJ2955/2N3055. I doubt it'll improve the sound any, though.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: USA
|
"what DC voltage is on the supply rails of the MF a100?"
The MJ15003/04 are 140V vs the 3055/2955 being 60V, so it shouldn't be a problem. "I doubt it'll improve the sound any, though." The MJ15003/04 have higher Beta at higher collector currents, so the distortion will go down a bit (but even though it will measure better, there may be no big difference in the sound).
__________________
Candidates for the Darwin Award should not read this author. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
the reason I asked at what voltage the MF run with, was to allow assessment on whether the 2955/3055 was a suitable transistor in the first place. It the existing transistors are unsuitable then anything with sufficient SOA will be an improvement, even if only that it does not blow up and irrespective of sound quality. What voltage does the MF run at?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
AndrewT, as I remember that runs at +/-25V idle rails (like MF A1).
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
+-25Vdc should allow most lower voltage power transistors to work. I guess that voltage would allow about 25W into 8r. Does that seem right? Any of the beefier and/or more modern semis would make a good replacement. Do you need To3 or To220 or To247 or some other package?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
|
They are TO-3 devices in the A1. They run at quite a high dissipation and it's been known that the 2955/3055's often give out under the thermal stress.
Be sure of which A1 you have. The Final edition is actually a rebadged B200 which is MOSFET outputs. You really can't do better than Mark's page on this: http://www.mhennessy1.f9.co.uk/mf_a1/index.htm Everything you could want to know is there pretty much |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
the MJ15003/4 can operate upto 250W, 200degC and will survive better than the lower specified 3055, even on the same heatsink.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wierd behaviour-> Musical fidelity A100 | A 8 | Solid State | 56 | 7th March 2012 11:57 AM |
| a dead Musical Fidelity A100 | otaku | Solid State | 58 | 14th August 2010 06:27 PM |
| Dead Musical Fidelity A100 - help needed!!! | cchean | Solid State | 10 | 24th July 2009 09:54 AM |
| pre-amp out - musical fidelity | puginfo | Solid State | 3 | 1st January 2008 10:35 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09252 seconds (78.04% PHP - 21.96% MySQL) with 10 queries |