Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd March 2007, 06:56 AM   #111
diyAudio Member
 
jacco vermeulen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: At the sea front, just under Rotterdam
Send a message via Yahoo to jacco vermeulen
Quote:
Originally posted by taj
Do these folks have any reputation I should be concerned about?
Nope.
Don't expect 2 DMMs to give the same reading, not even same model/brand ones.
GR hFe is >200. Getting a reading as low as 100 tells you something about your DMM, not about the Tosh.
The hFe function on a DMM is good for matching/checking, not for accurate hFe measuring.
__________________
Looks like Sponge Bob has killed another thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 08:12 AM   #112
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
I am not sure, but I think a DMM hFE test uses a constant current feeding the b-e junction and measures the resulting collector current.

This is very much different from setting constant collector current (Ic) and measuring Vbe and base current (Ib).

The constant Ic test set up is very easy to do on the bench IF you use a constant voltage supply.
This will give far more consistent results than the presumed DMM hFE method assumed above.

Tom,
copy the PASS method shown on his web site.

From the few tests I have carried out I consistently find a much bigger spread with PNP & Pchannel than the tight groupings I find for NPN and Nchannel. I think this points to the production difficulties in achieving good and reproduceable PNP and Pchannel characteristics.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 04:46 PM   #113
taj is offline taj
diyAudio Member
 
taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Quote:
Originally posted by jacco vermeulen


Nope.

...Getting a reading as low as 100 tells you something about your DMM, not about the Tosh.
The hFe function on a DMM is good for matching/checking, not for accurate hFe measuring.

Cool. Thanks Jacco.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 04:49 PM   #114
taj is offline taj
diyAudio Member
 
taj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Is it important (or worthwhile) to match diff-amp collector resistors as well? Or is a 1% mf resistor close enough?

..Todd
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 05:16 PM   #115
anatech is offline anatech  Canada
diyAudio Moderator
 
anatech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
Hi Todd,
Quote:
Is it important (or worthwhile) to match diff-amp collector resistors as well?
It can be, depending on your application. Remember that this is one small part of the circuit.
Quote:
Or is a 1% mf resistor close enough?
Generally speaking, I would say yes. As long as you are taking a signal from both collectors, otherwise it will not matter.

-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 05:41 PM   #116
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
I am not able to test/measure the tiny errors (distortions) that occur when the diff amp (LTP) runs with unbalanced collector currents.

The current injected from the VAS can be very significant and if using the collector loads for measuring and balancing the LTP then the VAS current introduces an error.
According to D.Self, the required balance accuracy is quite critical to minimising this first stage distortion and when the currents are as little as +-1% there is a very significant increase in distortion (he shows his graphs with the current difference and +-1%=2% difference).
If you want to better that and I think Self implies you should aim better than +-1% then the currents should be measured at the emitter resistors and I suggest matching to 0.5% if you think LTP balance is important to your design.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 05:45 PM   #117
anatech is offline anatech  Canada
diyAudio Moderator
 
anatech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
Hi Andrew,
As the LTP is the error detector/corrector in an amplifier, I would say it's important.

Get things as closely balanced as you reasonably can. That is the only advice I can give. I realise we may not see eye to eye on this point Andrew.

-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 06:14 PM   #118
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi Anatech,
Quote:
I realise we may not see eye to eye on this point Andrew
I suspect we do see eye to eye on many topics, matching of emitter resistors for future balancing measurements is important to me.
I was trying to offer a reasonable viewpoint that would be acceptable to most. Personally, since it costs nothing but time, I try to match (not absolute acurracy) to +-0.1% if I can see a benefit.
There is nothing worse than seeing/finding a voltage error and not knowing if the error is in the resistor used for measuring or in the semiconductor upstream.

Have I interpreted the VAS base current contribution correctly and do you agree that Re is better than Rc for LTP balance measurements?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd March 2007, 06:22 PM   #119
anatech is offline anatech  Canada
diyAudio Moderator
 
anatech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
Hi Andrew,
I agree that the effect of Vas base current must be compensated for. If emitter resistors are used, they will be very effective if matched. You may also unbalance these to compensate for the tendancies of the rest of the amp.

I try to make everything happy sitting near ground with minimal diff amp action first. Then your front end is more concerned with correcting errors than keeping the entire project from going DC.

I think we are in full agreement then. I just wanted to point out that there are other factors which may force the LTP from a balanced condition even though everything is matched in that location.

-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need of matching transistors & advanced circuits fotios Solid State 1 12th May 2007 02:08 PM
Matching transistors for electret microphone? cafh Everything Else 3 12th April 2007 11:16 AM
Matching Transistors Vivek Solid State 4 3rd February 2004 04:38 AM
Matching output transistors hifileslie Solid State 1 20th May 2002 11:48 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Page generated in 0.11951 seconds (81.89% PHP - 18.11% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio