|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#111 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Don't expect 2 DMMs to give the same reading, not even same model/brand ones. GR hFe is >200. Getting a reading as low as 100 tells you something about your DMM, not about the Tosh. The hFe function on a DMM is good for matching/checking, not for accurate hFe measuring.
__________________
Looks like Sponge Bob has killed another thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
I am not sure, but I think a DMM hFE test uses a constant current feeding the b-e junction and measures the resulting collector current. This is very much different from setting constant collector current (Ic) and measuring Vbe and base current (Ib). The constant Ic test set up is very easy to do on the bench IF you use a constant voltage supply. This will give far more consistent results than the presumed DMM hFE method assumed above. Tom, copy the PASS method shown on his web site. From the few tests I have carried out I consistently find a much bigger spread with PNP & Pchannel than the tight groupings I find for NPN and Nchannel. I think this points to the production difficulties in achieving good and reproduceable PNP and Pchannel characteristics.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
Quote:
Cool. Thanks Jacco. |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
Is it important (or worthwhile) to match diff-amp collector resistors as well? Or is a 1% mf resistor close enough?
..Todd |
|
|
|
|
#115 | ||
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi Todd,
Quote:
Quote:
-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
||
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
I am not able to test/measure the tiny errors (distortions) that occur when the diff amp (LTP) runs with unbalanced collector currents. The current injected from the VAS can be very significant and if using the collector loads for measuring and balancing the LTP then the VAS current introduces an error. According to D.Self, the required balance accuracy is quite critical to minimising this first stage distortion and when the currents are as little as +-1% there is a very significant increase in distortion (he shows his graphs with the current difference and +-1%=2% difference). If you want to better that and I think Self implies you should aim better than +-1% then the currents should be measured at the emitter resistors and I suggest matching to 0.5% if you think LTP balance is important to your design.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi Andrew,
As the LTP is the error detector/corrector in an amplifier, I would say it's important. Get things as closely balanced as you reasonably can. That is the only advice I can give. I realise we may not see eye to eye on this point Andrew. -Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
|
|
#118 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Anatech,
Quote:
I was trying to offer a reasonable viewpoint that would be acceptable to most. Personally, since it costs nothing but time, I try to match (not absolute acurracy) to +-0.1% if I can see a benefit. There is nothing worse than seeing/finding a voltage error and not knowing if the error is in the resistor used for measuring or in the semiconductor upstream. Have I interpreted the VAS base current contribution correctly and do you agree that Re is better than Rc for LTP balance measurements?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
|
Hi Andrew,
I agree that the effect of Vas base current must be compensated for. If emitter resistors are used, they will be very effective if matched. You may also unbalance these to compensate for the tendancies of the rest of the amp. I try to make everything happy sitting near ground with minimal diff amp action first. Then your front end is more concerned with correcting errors than keeping the entire project from going DC. I think we are in full agreement then. I just wanted to point out that there are other factors which may force the LTP from a balanced condition even though everything is matched in that location. -Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need of matching transistors & advanced circuits | fotios | Solid State | 1 | 12th May 2007 02:08 PM |
| Matching transistors for electret microphone? | cafh | Everything Else | 3 | 12th April 2007 11:16 AM |
| Matching Transistors | Vivek | Solid State | 4 | 3rd February 2004 04:38 AM |
| Matching output transistors | hifileslie | Solid State | 1 | 20th May 2002 11:48 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11951 seconds (81.89% PHP - 18.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |