|
Account disabled at member's request
|
Quote:
Originally posted by AndrewT
was accepting the traditional way to specify ClassB, but I think most of us know that that definition does not hold up, partly due to the 180degrees being nearly impossible to maintain. If you can't build it then why define it?
and D.Self also modifies the definition of ClassB to be exclusive to bias optimised push-pull to minimise crossover distortion rather than 50% duty cycle.
But we are getting too far from the point we started from and for the sake of this argument I accept that the traditional definition of ClassB is 180degree conduction.
ClassA does not suffer from crossover distortion.
All the other classes (AB, B, & overdriven ClassA) no matter how you define them, all suffer from crossover distortion.
We have been playing with this for four decades and no-one has solved the problem, irrespective of all the clever topologies that have been invented to reduce it's effect.
ps. I thought about not posting this reply, but what the heck, I took the time to think & write.
|
The traditional way of specifying class B is that each output half conducts for 180 degrees, +/- only a small amount. There is a slight leeway given with regards to bias current. Practical Class B designs for audio either draw no bias current al all, or only very slight bias current.
Getting back to the simple point I made in my first post; an over driven class A amplifier, by traditional definition, will never enter class B, as each output half will still be conducting for well over 180 deg.
|
|
|
|