|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
I want to make a pre-amp / headphone amp using discrete components that must be able to cope with a shorted output. Not just as a precaution, but because 1/4" jack used by headphones causes a short when being plugged in. I don't want to use any overload protection schemes if it will compromise sound quality like putting a resistor on the output to limit current.
How about using many transistors in parallel in the output stage so that each transistor will not be overloaded, and all the transistors in parallel reduce the output impedance to something very low like <1 Ohm. I've attached image of what I mean. Not sure how many transistors are needed to reduce output impedance. The value of the resistor (if the transistors used are TO-92 with 500mA max current and 15v supply) would be 15/0.5 = 30 ohm. Is this correct and do you think it will work ok? Also, is output impedance reduced when global negative feedback is used? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You may use my output stage, it is not a secret anymore, I've published it several times already on the forum. However, if you age going to run production you can't use it without my permission.
It is made of pair of complementary operational amplifiers where one transistor is a difeerencial cascade is replaced by diode. Why diode? Because impedance of feedback loop when voltage gain is =1 is low, and because breakdown voltage of a diode is higher than b-e junction of transistors. As I said, both opamps have 100% voltage feedback (through diodes), so voltage gain is =1. But when output is shorted feedback by voltage stops working ("closed" diodes), so input transistors have 100% NFB by current, output transistors amplify it up to safe level (actually, a bit higher than possible peak current on nominal load).
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
Quote:
Sheldon |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sheldon;
thank you for the patent law related lesson; actually, I am for a freedom of flexible usage of electronic schematic solutions, like in case of Free Software Foundation. When you use some free software you have to follow some rules mentioned in the special file. Does not matter if it is protected by law, or just a jentlemen - like agreement, but I want the same with my electyronics ideas, so no crooks can patent what people are free to use as an air, or water, or whatever. Quote:
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
|
Quote:
Quote:
No one can take your published invention and file a claim on it. Even with the U.S. one year grace period, they would have to show that they invented first and made a filing within a reasonable period - not something they invented years ago and were prompted by your publication to file. One technical addendum I should add to my prior comments on unissued patents: The publication of a provisional patent can allow for royalty claims from its date provided the patent issues with substantially the same invention claims. Sheldon |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
For headphone amp (+/- 15 V rails), I have used the simple expedient of a 50-ohm or 75 ohm resister in series with the output. So far I have neither heard, seen or measured any adverse effect from this. Dead shorts appear to do no harm.
It's class-A so it's running full-out all the time anyway. This may not be a suitable means in your case. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Quote:
Hi, I didn't want high output impedance for same reasons you don't want high output impedance from a speaker amp. Low output impedance for better damping factor, to give tighter bass. Some headphones may be designed to sound best from high output impedance (120 ohm is the official spec I believe). But most high end headphones work best from low output impedance like a loudspeaker does. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Left Coast
|
In principal, I agree that high output impedance can be problematic. In practice, it appears to be non-critical when there is sufficient current available. Such as an OpAamp driving a pair of medium sized BJT's such as mje340/350.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm
|
Quote:
Send me mail. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
For short circuit protection, just put a current limiting resistor in the collector leads of the output devices.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BGW250d shorted output jack...damage? | soccerman58 | Solid State | 4 | 2nd September 2008 10:19 PM |
| shorted out deck??? | new one | Car Audio | 6 | 22nd June 2008 01:09 PM |
| Pearl shorted...please help me out of this! | h_a | Pass Labs | 28 | 4th June 2007 02:55 PM |
| Designing an Output stage for an LM402 | dfdye | Solid State | 7 | 22nd May 2006 08:13 AM |
| Help in designing of current output amp | Edo | Solid State | 24 | 14th October 2002 09:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13626 seconds (73.63% PHP - 26.37% MySQL) with 11 queries |