|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: away
|
Quote:
Veeeerry nice.. Toimal vbe..dey be da teekit.. Your tails... be they 100 usec level or 100 msec...ie, silicon thickness or case thickness. Cheers, John |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
|
Eva,
The phenomenon that you're talking about.....does it occur with emitter/source follower outputs? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Koskenkorva Land
|
Quote:
have you tested SKA, if not would you still say that SKA suffers from cross conduction? Cheers Michael
__________________
"If transistors are blueberries and FETs are strawberries, then tubes must be.. pears" Michael 29th January 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
First, common drain outputs are not so rare, but not at all as common as common emitter. And you are a bit right in 'stability guess' - I think generally common drain can be a bit more instable as well as They are Often VERY FAST amplifiers. So when building such amp, you may need to do some things to stabilize. But this goes for most all amplifiers - even the standard type. -------------------------- Common collector output has got Voltage gain (usually considerably more than 1.0) in output stage. And this gain is effected by the load. While common emitter has got less than 1.0 ( something like x0.90-0.99 in a best case ). This makes common emitter amplifiers a bit less sensitive to loads. In my opinion. --------------------------- We can not say, that common collector or common emitter is better. They can do good, both. For example in PreAmplifiers, without a buffer follower stage, the feedback is taken directly from common collector output. This is not unusual for low power Class A pre amplifiers. I have a number of bookmarked links to Common Emitter ( Drain ) amplifiers. They are a challenge and sure are very interesting to design, to build and explore. lineup
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Koskenkorva Land
|
Lineup,
now you are really mixing up some things here... Hint: Common drain -> Source follower -> certainly not so rare! ![]() Cheers Michael
__________________
"If transistors are blueberries and FETs are strawberries, then tubes must be.. pears" Michael 29th January 2010 |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Next door
|
Hi,
Some examples : Bipolar collectors output : Wim de Jager, Erik van der Ven, Ed van Tuyl, ELECTRONICS WORLD, December 1999 pp. 982 – 987 Mosfet drain output : see the Transnova schematics at the Hafler site. |
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
Messages, posts are made up by sentences. Sentences are made up by words and expressions (combination of words and terms). Words are made up with letters, characters of alphabet. If I write: - Helo, Ultima Thule. the usual reply would be: - Hello, Lineup. Because this exchange of thoughts, messages is a context, that shows the receiver got the message, the words - even though was a detail in message not correct. Some, often people with negative attitude, will try to look for the details like bad spelling, bad improper words or terms. Because they like to take away attention from message or wont accept to take message. Maybe they even have another view, that was proven not very good and instead of accepting - they try to get out of Context .. out of Topic by focus interest on side notes .. on details. Details that are not so important for those who understand the intentions and what the sender is saying. this is not true communication - it is not good communication But i can agree so much, that it is very good we use same terms for same things in amps thanks for correcting my terminology - i have no whatsoever Degree from Any School in Electronic Engineering. In my plain world, something that is COMMON, share same thing in my mind this is the output joint. And when Collectors are joined together at one point this is for me 'common collector'. But this is for those using electronic terms and language is not the same as my definition and I have to use some other expression. So exchange all places where I say 'common collector' with the topic starter 'collector/drain output' and so you will be able to take part in discussion, Ultima Thule. As you will know what I mean. Hope everything is clear now. No Regards lineup
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Open collector npn output | marjan | Solid State | 5 | 15th January 2005 07:40 PM |
| Common Source versus Common Drain output stages | alaskanaudio | Solid State | 33 | 27th March 2003 03:04 PM |
| cheap output stages | hacknet | Solid State | 0 | 8th December 2002 02:55 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13705 seconds (80.97% PHP - 19.03% MySQL) with 11 queries |