|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
|
Do you guys have any favorites? I used to use the TL082's for inverting one channel to bridge the amp... are there any better (dual) op-amps out there for this purpose (i.e. unity gain/ low THD etc.)
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
hoe accurate do you need - post#1 here:
High loop Gain Composite Op Amp Circuits is likely to give unmeasurable audio frequency distortion |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
|
Thanks JC, but I needed a simple recommendation of a unity gain inverter... no need for buffers etc.
The application is to bridge a power amp, so I need one channel inverted and the other non-inverting pass through. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Singapore
|
Some nice unity gain stable dual Op-amps for audio just to name a few...
OPA2604, OPA2134, OPA2132, OPA2107 (expensive), NE5532(cheap), TL072 (cheap), AD712 etc. Regards Max |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Or just use a DRV134 to drive both sides, it should have much lower overall distortion as it is internally trimmed so you don't get differences between channels that you would if you just inverted one with an opamp.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Thanks Max, Since I will be buying just a couple, price is not a factor where I have spent over $200 in upgrades already.. don't want to screw it up by saving a few cents and making the effort less rewarding. How would you compare the sound of the OPA2604, 2134 and 2107? By the way how's the AD979? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Pinky have you heard this baby before? Seems like the practical approach... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
OPA2134 is a fair price and very good audio op.
Unity gain, non-inverted or inverted and the distortion will be practically zero. With a good normal regulated dual voltage supply. +-15 Volt is the recommended. OPA2134 has several useful features, that contributes to make it the main stream audio op of today: - It is stable in unity gain. - JFET input. You can use higher input impedance input resistor, if you like. - OPA2134 has good high current output for driving lower loads. - Easy to find most everywhere. You can compare price from many dealers. - Buy at least 10 pcs and put in your good-to-have-at-home shelf. For a unity gain line level buffer, I can't see any problems selecting an operational amplifier. Several other more simple op-amps, would do very well at gain=1. This is the most easy job, at least with reasonably normal input impedances and normal load impedances. This is also why a single transistor follower can do this buffering many times with as low distortion it is hard measure. It is when task is voltage amplification, say >=5 and maybe x20-100, when we can start bothering and try to find the most suited op-amp. lineup
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
|
Thanks line-up. Are these prone (more than others) to noise/hiss etc i.e. are they picky or happy -go-lucky :-)
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Quote:
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passive phase inversion? | TequilaKez | Parts | 4 | 6th October 2008 01:38 AM |
| Avoid polarity inversion | MaXiZ | Everything Else | 7 | 3rd March 2004 05:55 AM |
| Digital Data Inversion And Adding Question. | mrfeedback | Digital Source | 11 | 28th May 2003 01:33 PM |
| Polarity Inversion circuit | ashok | Everything Else | 17 | 5th April 2003 11:32 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.18732 seconds (49.84% PHP - 50.16% MySQL) with 10 queries |