|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#3461 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Agreed, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#3462 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
Hi Edmond, Neither. Do you miss me? :-). Actually, I have been unbelievably busy at work the last couple weeks. I have spent what little time I have had over on the Blowtorch thread trying to contribute some constructive input on PIM. I have not looked at the patent, but I did look at the figure you posted a few posts back. I agree that taking Miller compensation from the VAS collector node or from the following emitter follower in that particular circuit will likely disrupt the EC function. Cheers, Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#3463 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yes, I did miss you.
![]() Anyhow, thanks for your reply
__________________
Een volk dat voor tirannen zwicht, zal meer dan lijf en goed verliezen dan dooft het licht…(H.M. van Randwijk) |
|
|
|
|
#3464 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Hi
![]() I have a question regarding Bob's hexfet output stage configuration and thermal biasing. If a single BJT can compensate both hexfets, I don't see why adding a separate Vbe multiplier like this wouldn't work. Of course, that doesn’t mean it will work. (compensation not included)
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
|
#3465 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Or could it work by setting the Vbe multiplier with constant conductance and use the pot to adjust the EC bias. It's not really important, just a thought.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
|
#3466 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
Hi CBS240, It is a worthy goal to get the EC differential amplifier off of the heat sink and close in to the rest of its related circuitry. That was a compromise that I took in my original MOSFET EC amplifier, namely placing one of the EC differencing amplifier transistors on the heatsink to acheieve the needed temperature compensation. I have since toyed with various ideas on how best to leave the differencing amplifier transistor off of the heatsink and achieve the necessary temperature compensation by other means, but have not seriously pursued any of those. Cheers, Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#3467 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
I decided to spend some otherwise idle time burning up a few brain cells on ways to eliminate the need for heat sinking the error difference amplifier transistors. IMHO this is one of those experiments that may be better to build a real circuit instead of relying on just calc and sim......
This is a quick sketch of a circuit option that seems to work correctly, for the most part . I measure a difference between points A and Vout that is consistent with what I expect to see driving the changing Vgs WRT Iout. Q: Is there any significant drawbacks for using J-fet’s for the EC difference amplifiers? If the whole amplifier DC offset is controlled by a servo, a small difference in Vgs for the P and N channel J-fet’s @ Id shouldn’t be to big of an issue as long as they are close. The J-fets' bias is around the 0 tempco Qp. I like the self-bias characteristic for this part of the circuit. If one is OK with sacrificing a few more volts
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
|
#3468 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
some vero board and cheap parts I had lying around....
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
|
#3469 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
The heat sink is a bit small because I wanted to test the thermal bias reaction. As for the rest of the circuit, small is good, no?
![]() There is some tweaking that could be done yet, but so far the results are optimistic.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
|
|
#3470 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Hi
Burned up a few more brain cells and reconfigured the circuit to this. The results are a bit better. There was a small instability with the J-fet circuit. It was very touchy and had the tendency to lock up and start oscillating. The P-ch J-fet's Vgs are matched at Id; Vgs=2V. I happen to have more P-ch J-fets in the drawer than N-ch. The difference amplifier transistors bias is about 1mA. The Vbe multiplier bias is 2.6mA and still seems to create a slight overall negative tempco. I will play with this circuit some more and try to tweak it a bit better. Any tips as to what details I should concentrate on?
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun......
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |