|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#31 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
|
Lets try a new equation......different numbers
4 ohm Speaker. How much power output at 4 ohms, with power supply rails that are +/- 70V unloaded, but may drop to 54V under full load. Load goes to ground rail, so it is not bridged. Tell me if this is right?!?!? 54V rail minimum. -4V because of voltage drop of amp at clip. ________ 50V peak output *.707 to get RMS __________ 35.35V RMS output 35.35 squared = 1249.6225 / 4 ohms = 312.4WRMS or 624.8W Peak Is this accurate? |
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gütersloh
|
Yes, that's correct.
Mike |
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Prog,
a properly specified 8ohm speaker does not match this description Quote:
It is generally accepted that the minimum impedance of a speaker (anywhere in the frequency range) never falls below about three quarters to two thirds of the nominal impedance. Almost no-one builds to the DIN standard. Speakers are a difficult load and they stress the output stages of amps particularly if the sinks are allowed to get hot. Wrongly specifying the speaker impedance can only exacerbate the problem. But if retail amplfiers were designed to work well, rather than to a barely acceptable budget then the whole industry would have a better reputation, resulting in an ability to drive even difficult loads whin specification. Never EXPECT an amp to perform well when outside it's specified limitations, although some are very capable.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Ew,
I have an amp as bad (no, slightly better) than your example. It is a very poorly specified example with a complete imbalance between the various stages of the amplifier. Yet it sounds quite nice into a speaker load about twice the specified minimum. I would expect a well balanced design, if properly implemented, to achieve a peak voltage output into the specified load to be MUCH better than 20V less than the quiescent rail voltage. Mine is +-69Vrail falling to 55Vpk (into 8r) and to 49V (into 4r)and I think that 14V/20V loss is terrible. The pair of transformers (per monoblock) are VA underspecified by a factor of about 1.5 to 2. But your number crunching is correct, just aim higher.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Power Amplifier Output Topologies | danville | Solid State | 58 | 7th March 2010 05:40 PM |
| Power transformers versus amplifier output power..what is your option? | destroyer X | Solid State | 38 | 9th May 2009 05:23 PM |
| Power Amplifier Output Protection | kosalev | Solid State | 2 | 16th November 2007 11:39 AM |
| power output calculations, rated power and required power output | metebalci | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 22nd February 2004 05:49 PM |
| Increasing Power Output of a Car amplifier | Dj BASS AMP | Solid State | 5 | 5th October 2002 11:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08604 seconds (76.58% PHP - 23.42% MySQL) with 11 queries |