|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
Is this circuit a good substitute for opamp based buffers in active crossovers?
I´m going to build a 90Hz 12dB crossover fo a biamp setup and discrete buffers would "feel" better than ICs. This article ( http://www.tkhifi.com/div/Erno_Borbe...%20follower%22 ) mentions an output impedance of 2,3 ohms, but also that the input capacitance is high enough to cause trouble in filter applications. Should I be worried about that? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ventimiglia
|
Hello Fuling
no takes care to the input capacitance of the 2SK170 J-Fet: the parasitic capacitance of the PCB tracks is higher than J-Fet. For a crossover frequency of 90 Hz you must not have problems whit adequate resistors value(not more high than 20-30 K Ohms). I agree with you for discrete output buffer . |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The one and only
|
Inevitably you want to have some input and output resistance
to prevent issues when attached to external equipment.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ventimiglia
|
....and must calculate this when designing the filter.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
This is a most interesting idea. Monolithic opamps may not be the best in every situation. I'm going to read your links.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
Thanks.
Perhaps this (Simple Low Distortion JFET Buffer) would be even better, assuming we change to a bipolar supply? |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
What do you anticipate as the benefits of doing this with a JFET circuit, instead of a bipolar discrete circuit or a monolithic opamp?
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
The desire to use a Jfet is about noise. This type of buffer can be used without a feedback loop around it.
Feedback is maligned for a number of reasons... many of them valid.... some BS.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Fuling, very good buffer. This is a fet derived 'White follower' developed in the '30'A or 40's for tubes.
One small addition can make this design almost perfect. Just add an other 22 ohm resistor between the OUTPUT source follower and the DRAIN of the lower fet. This will give you virtually ZERO DC offset from input to output, allowing you to DIRECT COUPLE. This is very important, as good caps are more expensive and space consuming than good fets. This change PRESUMES the matching of the two output fets. If you do not or can not match the fets, then put a trim pot or resistor in series or parallel to the bottom 22 ohm resistor and change its value to 10 ohms or so. Then you can adjust for ZERO DC OFFSET. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
|
This is one of the projects I'm working on also in time-sharing mode. Since my preamp is all single-ended JFET class A, it didn't make sense to me to give up and use opamps for the crossover.... My first effort uses simple JFET buffers with current source loading. I may try something more sophisticated when the rest of my projects cool down a bit.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Passive crossover into active crossover | hahfran | Multi-Way | 16 | 10th February 2008 06:16 PM |
| Active crossover | ivan-UTN-ARG | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 3rd December 2007 12:39 AM |
| L-R active crossover ? | AndrewT | Multi-Way | 1 | 22nd September 2006 05:55 PM |
| Help with active crossover | sunil | Multi-Way | 3 | 8th March 2004 10:44 AM |
| XVR1 active crossover, discrete active stage | promitheus | Pass Labs | 18 | 22nd July 2002 01:29 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |