|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Hi,
I've had a look through previous posts and haven't been able to find an answer that satisfies completely - although someone may be able to point out differently. So... I'm building (eventually) a pair of P101 amps from the Elliot Sound Products site. I'm also using a soft-start circuit from the same place. But, as work sent me to Singapore for a month (yes, I know, poor me:-), I've had a chance to think - call the newspapers!!! I've got some speakers that have passive cross-overs, that would need a full-range signal fed to the amplifiers - hence unbalanced (RCA) inputs. But I also have a pair of actively crossed speakers on the go (some parts built, some not yet). And the cross-over is the venerable (and not too bad) Behringer CX-3400 - with balanced XLR outputs. I'd like to be able to feed these power amps with either feed. Should I just short the pins on the XLR plugs (or just get an adapter for $7), into an unbalanced (RCA) input. Or should I use both RCA and XLR inputs and feed the XLRs via a transformer and op-amp network and the RCA directly to the standard P101 input?
__________________
Jont. "It is impossible to build a fool proof system; because fools are so ingenious." |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary
|
You may be able to modify the P101 to accept a differential input. Have you looked through the ESP forum? Or try posting the question there as well.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Hi Paul,
There's another project on the site (2 actually) for building a balanced receiver. Although, from careful reading of the crossover manual, it should be safe to use an XLR-RCA adaptor at the amplifier end. So, no need to run both types of input. I'm still going to leave space in the box in case I want to put in XLR plugs as well. What I was trying to get at last night (I'd been working on a problem at work and watching the football, so I may not have been clear) was whether it's simple to do both. The amp has an input and a ground, and the RCA has an input and a ground, and the receiver project has a + and - input and a ground, but has one output and a ground. Does this not mean that they could all just fit together (with a switch to allow you to decide which is input)?
__________________
Jont. "It is impossible to build a fool proof system; because fools are so ingenious." |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Balanced & Unbalanced input with LM3886 chipamp.com | JohnnyP00 | Chip Amps | 5 | 17th January 2010 02:33 AM |
| Unbalanced to balanced input conversion? | SQLGuy | Solid State | 53 | 19th October 2009 01:39 AM |
| Balanced input stage beneficial for unbalanced turntables? | leadbelly | Analogue Source | 37 | 28th April 2008 01:34 PM |
| converting and unbalanced in into a balanced input | joyfulstudios | Parts | 2 | 12th June 2005 12:41 AM |
| Transformer at input of SOZ to convert unbalanced->balanced? | psarin | Pass Labs | 29 | 29th December 2003 05:13 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07555 seconds (72.22% PHP - 27.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |