|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vilnius
|
Classical topology, nothing fancy. The PCB looks quite tolerable. Separate capacitors for each channel/supply rail (probably an overkill). I'm worried about outputs returning to main ground plane. I just can't seem to find a way to route them to supply pins :/
Gain = 2 because of neat DC matching and because my 40ohm phones won't need more gain when fed from a 2Vrms source anyway. Any suggestions are very welcome.
__________________
Nothing is as simple as it seems |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vilnius
|
pcb components
__________________
Nothing is as simple as it seems |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vilnius
|
tracks
__________________
Nothing is as simple as it seems |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
|
Hi wxn,
A few suggestions: [list=1][*]You can get better output transistors than BD139/140. Try MJE340/350[*]It may reduce distortion at low levels if you add a resistor (say 470R) from the opamp output to the board output.[*]Sharp angles (<90 degrees) are bad on PCBs, as it provides a spot for etchant to get in under the track. You've got nasty angles on your base connections, and some other spots. Try to stick to 45/90 degree tracks wherever possible, as it makes things neater.[*]You could probably go for thinner tracks and larger spaces in a lot of places. Your narrowest space should be equal to your narrowest track. A good number for home-made boards is 0.02" (0.5mm) tracks and spaces. The only spots that need more are the power supply connections and the output nets.[/list=1] Hope that's been of use. Cheers, Suzy |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vilnius
|
Thanks for such a great reply!
Those BD139/140 are there simply because I know little about power transistors. Thanks for the hint, substituting for MJE340/350 shouldn't cause any problems. About that distortion, the output stage is runing class A at (almost) all times so there won't be any crossover problems anyway. Am I right? And the suggestions about angles tracks are valid. I missed them somehow :/
__________________
Nothing is as simple as it seems |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vilnius
|
Updated. Is it better now?
__________________
Nothing is as simple as it seems |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
|
It's an improvement, but you've still got a heap of acute angles between tracks. Don't ever do this. It's asking for trouble.
Regards, Suzy |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
My advice? Rip it all up and start again.
It can take four or five attempts to get a good layout. I know, I've been there. Set up the track routing to only give you 45 degree corners, get a nice smooth signal path, then add the star ground. Resistors, etc. to rails can be really useful for getting you out of trouble, and don't be afraid to move components around to get things neat.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
hi wxn,
Good start. The schematic looks like it *may* have an error around the feedback resistor area. Have a look at this link below: http://www.siliconchip.com.au/cms/A_30588/article.html If you have a look at the print firendly version of this page it gives a very small picture of the PCB. The schematic also shows some alternative output transitors (as pointed out by Suzy). If my understanding of headamps is correct, because the cct voltage is low and power output is low, you can afford to select transistors with lower noise values. regards
__________________
Greg Erskine |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 15W kit schematic errors! | N9VOC | Chip Amps | 5 | 24th February 2012 09:28 PM |
| First PCB Design. Any Errors? | BubbaGump | Chip Amps | 5 | 13th August 2007 07:12 PM |
| Errors with DIY JLTi schematic | DragonMaster | Chip Amps | 0 | 6th May 2006 01:54 PM |
| need help in correcting errors urgently | weifeng | Parts | 5 | 13th February 2006 12:54 AM |
| denon dcd-485 cd errors hlp req plz | fender62 | Digital Source | 1 | 15th August 2005 01:48 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09652 seconds (77.75% PHP - 22.25% MySQL) with 11 queries |