|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Someone mentioned that the input pair of transistors of a NE5534 can be bypassed and an external pair can be used.
I was considering using a pair of 2SK170's. Has anyone tried this or with any other transistors ? It's been done commercially long ago when they didn't have better opamps. However it will be interesting to know what the results will be. Will this work in a Spice simulation ? I'm not sure if the bypassing scheme can be simulated ! Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Tie the inputs to V- and connect the new input pair to the offset trim inputs. But why do want to do this? This was a good idea 20 years ago. Now you can buy a good opamp with better results.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Just curious. I want to know how it tranforms the performance of the opamp audibly. Apart from electrical specs it must affect the sound of the standard chip. How ?
Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
It *must*? Why? Jan Didden
__________________
/Another new issue: Linear Audio Volume 3! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Bipolar input changed to jfet.
Distortion spectrum could be different. I'm not sure if that should be audible but no harm checking it out. Maybe I shouldn't have said 'must'. Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond CA
|
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...907#post706907 has links that may answer your question and offer other information on 5534 hacks, the schematic link may not work now. The Siliconix appnote I referenced describes a cascoded JFET input pair with 2-BJT current sink but any reasonable input pair design could be used, I like using just matched high-beta NPN (BC550, 2N5210, 2N5087, MPSA18) with emitter degeneration resistors and a current sink resistor for low-gain inverting input stages.
The front-end bypass scheme can be simulated if the spice model is modified to remove the first stage NPN pair, I have attached such a model. Simulation with this model is OK for estimating DC biasing and feedback loop stability. Don't expect useful distortion analysis, the results will be insanely optimistic. The front-end bypass allows frequency compensation by reducing DC open-loop gain, if input transistor gm is less than 2.5mmho no comp capacitor should be needed for unity gain stability, if higher I suggest adding emitter/source degeneration resistors if input noise is not critical. Sure there are modern op amps that perform better than a hacked 5534, but if 5534s, matched 2SK170 and 1/4W resistors are all you can get your hands on and you have time to build then this hack is probably a better option than TL072 or 4558. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi Nuvistor,
can you post the schematics to go with the spice listings?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond CA
|
OK, here's a schematic.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond CA
|
This ZIP package contains LTSpice schematics and spice models. I further improved the normal 5534 model's open loop gain accuracy vs. datasheet curve in the 1 to 10MHz range, this is included. A text file with description of application and models and png files of the schematics are included.
To simulate, unzip to a directory and open the schematic(s) with LTSpice, no need to move the models and schematic symbol to your main LTSpice directories. The simulation is only for the input hack, you will have to build a circuit to tinker with the output hack. The text file describes the output hack well enough. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The NE5534....misunderstood? | TimA | Solid State | 102 | 8th December 2010 02:23 AM |
| OPA228 vs NE5534 | AudioWizard | Analog Line Level | 4 | 21st February 2008 08:57 PM |
| NE5532 vs NE5534 | rumblinbass | Parts | 9 | 14th December 2007 02:24 PM |
| replacing NE5534 AN | pjpoes | Parts | 3 | 23rd January 2007 05:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10356 seconds (79.38% PHP - 20.62% MySQL) with 11 queries |