|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1411 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
|
Sorry, didn't notice link went to main search page. Look at http://www.fischerelektronik.de/fisc...cher/D.1.E.pdf and see what you think would be best.
Bob G. |
|
|
|
|
#1413 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
It appears that the LA 1 series has a higher dissipation capacity than the LA 2 (but also noisier), and the A-Type with the mounting fins offers the greatest device mounting flexibility. But Jacco's suggestion for the B-Type mounting looks promising also. I would prefer the LA-1-03-A (overall length 161.6mm) or the LA-1-04-A (overall length 198.1mm) for vertical mounting in 7"+ or 8"+ tall case.
Robert |
|
|
|
|
#1414 | |
|
Official Court Jester
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
hehe http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attac...amp=1173001256
__________________
my Papa is smarter than your Nelson ! tnx to |
|
|
|
|
|
#1415 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Norway
|
Quote:
Regards
__________________
Regards Flodstroem |
|
|
|
|
|
#1416 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
I would be interested in a group buy, but I'm looking for something like a MF25-151.5 (25 cm wide), and 40 cm high. So it will be a standing design with the fins running vertically. A single heatsink per monoblock -so it may have to be a bit wider or higher. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1417 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bloubergstrand
|
Just out of curiosity, has anyone actually finished building his boards yet? Or is it still just organising the ancillary hardware?
|
|
|
|
|
#1418 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
|
Quote:
AndrewT in post 1040 calculated .09C\W @60c per channel as the minimum acceptable for passive cooling. The MF25-151 looks like .29C\W @80c. Seems way too small. In fact the selection of a pair of heatsinks less than .18C\W each is very limited. Someone estimated a usable heatsink at 10kg. This is why I am investigating forced cooling. Bob G. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1419 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
|
Quote:
I'm not against forced cooling with a slow fan, but I really dislike the amount of dust that collects and degrades cooling. (And is generally dislikable.) Anyway, I'll set Iq according to the thermal capacity of the heatsink, and I'm planning a low Iq setting for A/V use and as an always-on mode. I can barely get my KSA 50S to go into the highest bias plateu without my ears bleeding, so the KSA100 is a bit of overkill anyway! ;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#1420 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lousy Anna
|
"assuming termal resistance scales linearly"
I was informed that doubling the height of a heat sink does not double the capacity. As the air rises it heats and is not the same as two separate heat sinks side by side. Yours may indeed work; I am just repeating what I was told by a manufacturer about height. The manufacturer disappointed me with news about my height, and my girlfriend disappointed me with news about my length. Rough times I tell ya..
__________________
Troy Thinking positive doesn't make things better, it makes you a better person. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13498 seconds (73.39% PHP - 26.61% MySQL) with 11 queries |