Decoupling cap placement - virtual ground dual op amp? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th March 2006, 09:46 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Default Decoupling cap placement - virtual ground dual op amp?

Evening, all.

I've trawled the net (and DIYa) for some further advice on decoupling. I'm aware of the "keep it close to the pins" basics, but I'm wondering what the best way to decouple a dual op amp is - is it any different from a single op amp? I'm trying to improve the sound of some Rohm 15218 dual op amps (which I presume is their take on the generic, bog-standard dual op amp theme). Having had a quick look at the circuit board in my Denon DRS-710 cassette deck, I'm wondering if the two op amps which seem to form the playback front end and buffering are connected to a virtual ground. Both op amps run from +8V and -8V rails

An application note for the AN-202 shows a number of approaches to decoupling. In the case of a grounded load, it talks about minimising the current loop by placing the decoupling caps between the load ground and the relevant power pins of the op amp which drives the load. When it talks about 'load', does it mean the resistor connected between the input of the following op amp and ground?

In the case of my tape deck, there are two 15218s. The load resistor (if I'm guessing correctly above) doesn't seem to be connected to ground. Does this imply a virtual ground (although I can't see another op amp performing this duty, clueless as I am in these matters)

I'd like to improve the decoupling as the existing caps which decouple these two op amps are quite a way from either op amp (one cap is connected from the positive rail to ground, the other from negative rail to ground).

Is it possible just to connect a single cap between the respective power pins?

Maybe I'm just getting my knickers in a twist, so any guidance would be much appreciated.

Cheers, Jon.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th March 2006, 06:30 AM   #2
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
I think an extra decoupling cap (bypass) between the power pins will do no harm. I also read it tends to be more effective with faster opamps.

If the existing decoupling is more than a few cm from the opamp power pins then you should go ahead and put in some additional decoupling near the power pins (of each) to ground.
regards Andrew T.
Sent from my desktop computer using a keyboard
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
virtual ground codacola Parts 6 7th March 2013 01:24 AM
Virtual Ground ? Bernhard Solid State 13 4th March 2009 01:57 PM
DIY virtual surround / 5.1 speakers front placement pelanj Multi-Way 8 4th December 2008 08:57 PM
PS decoupling cap placement Klimon Tubes / Valves 2 24th November 2008 06:06 PM
virtual jsteigs Chip Amps 6 3rd February 2005 10:49 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2