Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Solid State
Home Forums Articles Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10th February 2006, 10:49 AM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
Terry Demol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: *
Hi all,

I have the cross coupled pair sussed out completely. Sorry, have
to go to bed will reply in morning, it's been a big week.

Cheers,

Terry
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 10:53 AM   #22
Eva is offline Eva  
diyAudio Member
 
Eva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Near the sea
Send a message via MSN to Eva
Humm...

From now on, I think that I'm going to use the last circuit in all my projects. It has another nice feature that makes it superior to the 4 transistor version: The Vbe corrected transistors are operated all at a similar Vce. This is a great thing because d(transconductance)/d(Ic) "slope" changes a lot with Vce, and a transistor operating at 1.4V Vce is not going to match at all with another one operating at 40V or so.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 10:57 AM   #23
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Talking Cross-quad

The cross-quad circuit was discussed here in connection with a moving coil cartridge preamp:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...099#post377099
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 11:02 AM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
Terry Demol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: *
Default Re: Cross-quad

Quote:
Originally posted by Elso Kwak
The cross-quad circuit was discussed here in connection with a moving coil cartridge preamp:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...099#post377099
where
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 11:08 AM   #25
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Lightbulb Re: Re: Cross-quad

Quote:
Originally posted by Terry Demol


where

further on in that thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 01:25 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
darkfenriz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: back to civilization
Quote:
Originally posted by Eva

Click the image to open in full size.

This works the same or better provided that the model of PNP and NPN devices is chosen to have similar transconductance around 1mA. Furthermore, the current mirrors with high value resistors work only for audio frequencies and roll off quickly at RF, thus improving phase margin. As a bonus, this circuit should not suffer from latching or phase reversal issues, altough turn-on after a overdrive period relies on leakage currents and positive feedback, so it may probably take some hundreds of nanoseconds.

Yes, after any type of overdrive it can severely oscillate, therefore this a nice tim generator, or be positively fed back (lack current thru one leg implies switching off of its 'driver') so that everything turns into smoke.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 01:30 PM   #27
diyAudio Member
 
darkfenriz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: back to civilization
Quote:
Originally posted by Eva
A funnier version:

It should be also latching-free and phase-reversal free.

Are you sure?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 03:12 PM   #28
Eva is offline Eva  
diyAudio Member
 
Eva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Near the sea
Send a message via MSN to Eva
Quote:
Originally posted by darkfenriz



Are you sure?

Try it, it simulates fine. According to Pspice, it behaves well no matter how much overdrive is applied, as opposed to the original cross quad that latches badly.

Also, according to Pspice, it has slightly better phase margin than the original circuit, that has a peak at 22Mhz (BC556B) that never disappears (those naughty base currents badly routed), no matter how much compensation is added (in all circuits that I tried Pspice requires 10pf capacitors between each input and output node for stability). THD and gain figures are similar.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 03:20 PM   #29
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Quote:
Originally posted by darkfenriz

Are you sure?
Behaves OK on my sim, but what is the advantage? The gain is just x10 and 20MHz -3dB

One thing about the basic crossed quad is relatively poor supply rejection. Further cascoding is needed, but we probably need a higher voltage stage anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2006, 03:25 PM   #30
Eva is offline Eva  
diyAudio Member
 
Eva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Near the sea
Send a message via MSN to Eva
The advantage is not the gain but the Vbe linearisation. Anyway, classic amplifier circuits have no room for more gain.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diff drive bigwill Tubes / Valves 38 6th February 2009 05:33 PM
cross-quad and cascomp circuits rtarbell Solid State 15 1st September 2007 02:09 PM
diff or parallel dac TJ Digital Source 6 10th November 2003 12:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 PM.

Page generated in 0.10701895 seconds (79.58% PHP - 20.42% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2010 diyAudio