|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: *
|
Hi all,
I have the cross coupled pair sussed out completely. Sorry, have to go to bed will reply in morning, it's been a big week. Cheers, Terry |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Humm...
From now on, I think that I'm going to use the last circuit in all my projects. It has another nice feature that makes it superior to the 4 transistor version: The Vbe corrected transistors are operated all at a similar Vce. This is a great thing because d(transconductance)/d(Ic) "slope" changes a lot with Vce, and a transistor operating at 1.4V Vce is not going to match at all with another one operating at 40V or so. |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Banned
|
The cross-quad circuit was discussed here in connection with a moving coil cartridge preamp:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...099#post377099
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: *
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
further on in that thread |
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: back to civilization
|
Quote:
Yes, after any type of overdrive it can severely oscillate, therefore this a nice tim generator, or be positively fed back (lack current thru one leg implies switching off of its 'driver') so that everything turns into smoke. |
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: back to civilization
|
Quote:
Are you sure? |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Try it, it simulates fine. According to Pspice, it behaves well no matter how much overdrive is applied, as opposed to the original cross quad that latches badly. Also, according to Pspice, it has slightly better phase margin than the original circuit, that has a peak at 22Mhz (BC556B) that never disappears (those naughty base currents badly routed), no matter how much compensation is added (in all circuits that I tried Pspice requires 10pf capacitors between each input and output node for stability). THD and gain figures are similar. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Quote:
One thing about the basic crossed quad is relatively poor supply rejection. Further cascoding is needed, but we probably need a higher voltage stage anyway. |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The advantage is not the gain but the Vbe linearisation. Anyway, classic amplifier circuits have no room for more gain.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diff drive | bigwill | Tubes / Valves | 38 | 6th February 2009 05:33 PM |
| cross-quad and cascomp circuits | rtarbell | Solid State | 15 | 1st September 2007 02:09 PM |
| diff or parallel dac | TJ | Digital Source | 6 | 10th November 2003 12:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10701895 seconds (79.58% PHP - 20.42% MySQL) with 11 queries |