diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Solid State (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/)
-   -   SOA protection (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/72110-soa-protection.html)

davidsrsb 19th January 2006 03:45 PM

SOA protection
 
As TI now do cheap 4 channel 10 bit A/Ds which can sample at MS/s, what do you think about a SOA protection circuit that measures both voltage and current of both output devices. A 8 bit PIC or AVR cpu should be able to do the processing and control a mute and a speaker protection relay. The voltage signals would also be usable for tweeter protection and dc fault detection. I would use one A/D and one cpu per channel to avoid routing the input signal too far.

It should be possible to follow the manufacturers SOA curves much more accurately than the usual analogue circuits.

Workhorse 19th January 2006 03:56 PM

In case of Reactive loads...Muting isn't a viable solution..because there is still finite dissipation occurs in corresponding output devices due to V-I phase Lead/Lag....which could damage the devices...

poobah 19th January 2006 04:02 PM

It has been my experience that unless you have forced cooling methods, excellent thermal engineering, and very well defined waveforms, you should not operate a device anywhere near its SOA.

Max rated current / 3 - 4 will make things that don't melt.

;)

davidsrsb 20th January 2006 12:22 AM

My experience is that bipolar amps either:
1) have very conservative and intrusive SOA that can get into real trouble with reactive loads
2) have overkill multiple output devices in parallel with the cost issues
3) blow output devices

Judging from the postings in this forum (3) is way to common

Checking against the VI curve and talking into account the time would allow you to be certain that you are safely inside the SOA limits, instead of the "rule of thumb" limits which make bipolars usable at only about half of the rated voltage.

poobah 20th January 2006 12:38 AM

Guess you didn't really read my post...

It's takes a lot of engineering, and TESTING, to run devices, especially with wildly undefined waveforms at there maximum.

For a "one off" DIY project it is probably not worth the hassle. For a design to be built in the thousands it is worth the hassle.

And in the the end, when you have maximized device usage, what you have built is a modern TV set... 6-8 years and hurl it in the trash.

:rolleyes:

CBS240 20th January 2006 12:55 AM

It is best with audio to design via the DC SOA curve to be safe. The problem is that it is way to easy to get fake devices and because of the cheaper, smaller die, the SOA goes out the window usually as smoke.:smash: BJT's generally can't handle much current with a high Vce. This makes them more likely to become toast with highly reactive loads then FET's.(with the exception of genuine MJ21194/5:D) Personally I like BJT's, but you have to observe the limitations.

AndrewT 20th January 2006 07:44 AM

Hi,
on a recent thread the designer suggested using the 10mS SOAR as the limiting factor for music based loadings.

This invites trouble.

As an alternative, I have used DC or one second SOAR and then applied a cap to allow the passage of very short term peak currents that would normally exceed the long term SOAR.
This applies to both BJT and FET output stages into reactive loads (usually a theoretical 60degree phase angle).

My main difficulty is identifying the cap value that does not permit damage to the output stage.

davidsrsb 20th January 2006 01:14 PM

Using the 10mS SOA for music is reckless, the lowest impedance of most reflex speakers is below 100Hz and the reflex tuning resonance leads to the the worst phase shifts below 100Hz too. Then play music with a lot of bass and you are going to get overload.

What I am trying to propose is using a digital method to constantly check that the devices are always inside the SOA curve by a safety margin of say 30%, not just guessing. So long as the devices are genuine, I trust reputable transistor makers to make a reliable product that meet their specs.

fscarpa58 20th January 2006 01:44 PM

Quote:

In case of Reactive loads...
Hi all

Can any of you suggest a test reactive load (and the frequency
of the test signal ) to be used during simulation stage to verify SOA limits are not trespassed?

Federico

JensRasmussen 20th January 2006 03:26 PM

My two cents:

I think it is most important to define what the amp is going to be used for:

1) Active speakers (No passive X-over to worrie about)
2) 8 Ohm passive speaker
3) 4 Ohm passive speaker
4) 2 Ohm passive speaker

Case 1 and 2 are less of a problem, 3 and 4 are hard!

If you know the load it is possible to design the SOA protection to match this.

If you are unsure what the amp is going to be used for (This is often the case) you have to be conservative in your protection levle and maybe even expect case 4.

From Rods pages:
For the 3 ohm case, a reactive load (at 45 phase angle) can be simulated by using a 477uH inductor in series with the 3 ohm resistor (for a frequency of 1kHz)

\Jens


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:14 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2