|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
My thinking on a rail to rail vmosfet amplifier, with good supply rejection
Replace source V4 with an opamp and overall negative feedback to make a practical amplifier. Ignore transistor types, I use SIMetrix free. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
I guess you want to use R13 and R3 to control bias. I would suggest use a more normal feedback. Join base of Q3 and Q6. Remove R4, R5,C1 And also R13 and R3. Problem with this type of amplifier is how to control the bias of output. If this could be done, without adding resistors in output rail, then we could have a rail-to-rail amplifier. With use of MOSFETS this could be done, as they are controlled by a voltage by Gates. I am almost sure an idea like yours, has been used before. Maybe someone knows.
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
I am trying to produce a nested feedback design. I was trying to get an output stage which was linear because of local feedback. It has to have some gain to avoid clipping problems earlier, I chose x3.
The input stage could be a decent opamp, so I avoid the usual miller compensation arrangement with problems of signals being referenced to on of the (dirty) supply rails. R3 and R13 define the quiescent current, they can be fairly low valued, so the voltage drop across them is very small compared with the usual ~5V or more of a complementary source follower. I have been thinking about building a class A amp with as high efficiency as possible for a tweeter driver. The relatively low rails used by class A amps makes the normal follower configuration a poor choice. I don't like the bias stability problems of running common source outputs without local feedback and depending on enormous loop gain and feedback to get a low output impedance. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Filter Cap Directly from Rail to Rail, excluding Center Tap | Workhorse | Power Supplies | 8 | 29th August 2007 12:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08915 seconds (71.23% PHP - 28.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |