John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to Latest
scott wurcer

scott wurcer

R.I.P
Joined 2004
1audio said:


More like -160dB to -150dB.

I would be cautious of the 22M carbon comp resistor. That will have a high excess noise and less that stabe value. The need for a biasing resistor for the mike capsule requires such a resistor but I have spent many hours troubleshooting a noisy resistor like that in an HP400H voltmeter. Caddock has some good options for that application.
Click to expand...

It's not where you think, they're in the followers on the output. The resistance is shunted below 10Hz and there is no DC on them hence no excess noise. You are welcome to be interested in added noise 20 or 30 dB below the existing noise floor, I just don't find it too productive.

Same for the -150dB vs -160dB, There has to be diminishing returns.
 
1

1audio

Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
scott wurcer said:


It's not where you think, they're in the followers on the output. The resistance is shunted below 10Hz and there is no DC on them hence no excess noise. You are welcome to be interested in added noise 20 or 30 dB below the existing noise floor, I just don't find it too productive.

Same for the -150dB vs -160dB, There has to be diminishing returns.
Click to expand...

If there is no DC the resistors should not matter, but then why are they there? A pencil line could almost do the same thing.

I doubt that anything below -130 dB matters but as a way to find defective parts or significant differences in construction the distortion test is useful.
 
john curl

john curl

Member
Joined 2003
Scott is showing where sloppy engineering can create poorly performing products. Usually, you have to be VERY careful with high value carbon resistors, as they can have both big time 1/f noise and distortion. Not always, but often. It just is not good engineering to put in potentially problematic parts. Maybe, if you are making toys, it is OK. Hi Fi, no!
 
1

1audio

Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
scott wurcer said:


A picoamp bias return through 22Meg, 22 micro volts DC, please, you DO understand these issues better, why be so obtuse?
Click to expand...

Actually I don't have much of a clue what you are doing. The picoamps of bias current does help me better understand where they might be used. I read no voltage literally. Again the next question I would have is how much the temp variations will change the bias current in question. And whether it will matter.

For the uninitiated looking in, FET bias or leakage increases a lot with temperature. It can be a surprise if its not planned for. I have also seen Mica caps and Ceramic caps get very noisy in high impedance circuits when they have a bias across them. But they measure perfectly when cold out of circuit. And a hydroscopic surface contamination on a circuit board can drive you nuts. Really high impedance stuff requires a lot of care.
 
SY

SY

Ex-Moderator
Joined 2002
SYclotron.com
john curl said:
They appear to be 'clueless', Demian. Engineers, BAH!
Click to expand...

Yeah, and those Analog fellows seem to be the worst. I'll bet Scott even uses a moving magnet cartridge!

Demian, the other unexpected thing (it was for me, anyway, the first time I ran into it) is drain voltage. I had built a preamp with a FET input which had higher distortion and noise than I expected. Dropped the drain voltage by a factor of 2 and suddenly everything was OK. This caused much head-scratching, since the curves looked so nice and flat. Dumb old tube guy that I am, I had never heard of impact ionization...
 
Edmond Stuart

Edmond Stuart

Member
Joined 2003
data-odyssey.nl
When I was young I drove this car:
 

Attachments

  • djet.png
    djet.png
    61 KB · Views: 474
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom