|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#6551 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Please, just kidding the JC-80 is way too complicated for a hobby circuit. I'm still working on my preamp in a pipe.
I had to borrow a digital QuanTech from the fab development guys because the old ones require a bunny suit and clean room to get at. First BF862 out of the bag measured 2.3nV at 10Hz and .6 at 100kHz @5mA.
__________________
2012, our time is running out. |
|
|
#6552 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
How about the rest? Any problems?
|
|
|
#6553 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The problem with these is that they need to be soldered to an adaptor (SOT-23 only). I have to find a socket. I was testing about 8 different FET's for my microphone project. You were right on the 2SK222 1.3nV flat right across the band only 1.7 at 10Hz at only 1mA 9.1mS too. These Sanyo FET's were only a tiny bit worse than the Toshiba ones at half the Ciss. I wonder if they make P-channel.
__________________
2012, our time is running out. |
|
|
#6554 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Quote:
I finally got the chassis made up for you for the monoblocks. How do you like the Preamp in a Pipetm logos I had engraved in the covers? Nice touch, eh? Simple, yet elegant. ![]() se |
|
|
|
#6555 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Scott - that is interesting information!
Did you try any BF861A/B/C JFETs? If space is scarce, and lower noise is wanted, one can put several SOT-23:s on top of each other to save precious PCB space I did not find any P-ch for the 2SK222. P-ch devices are sooo rare. Sigurd Quote:
|
|
|
|
#6556 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
Hi Edmond. Yes, it's just a guess of mine that doing an AC analysis with different DC offsets would reveal PIM. I have not tried it yet. The idea is that the phase data in the AC analysis can be read with very good precision. I believe that 1/1000 of a degree of the 7 kHz sinusoid used for PIM testing corresponds to about 0.39 ns, which should be pretty good PIM resolution. That is on the order of the resolution of my PIM analyzer, IIRC. Of course, PIM is measured with a 60 Hz large signal, so measuring it with SPICE using a varying DC offset means that we are assuming that DC behavior is similar to 60 Hz behavior. Cheers, Bob |
|
|
|
#6557 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Guess? We don't need no stinkin' guesses around here! Put up or get out of the way!
|
|
|
#6558 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Steve that looks like 40yr old technology ala "High Times".
__________________
2012, our time is running out. |
|
|
|
#6559 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: berkeley ca
|
Scott, I thought that using a Quantek was a 40 year old, has been, effort!
|
|
|
#6560 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Best regards...
__________________
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. " Niels Bohr |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.26775 seconds (68.18% PHP - 31.82% MySQL) with 11 queries |