|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
Quote:
Tthis was not in your circuit before. I think I saw amplifierguru show somewhere, how to use correction in between emittors in a symmetrical differential input.
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
I think I saw amplifierguru show somewhere,
how to use correction in between emittors in a symmetrical differential input. Here it is with his diagram: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...815#post799815 It is from the topic: To use DC servo or not? I belong to those who do not use DC-servo. I know it is theoretically a more safe method, especially without input capacitor. I always use a DC-blocking cap at input. Yes, in some of my amplifiers even Output DC-blocking Capacitor which makes DC-offset very much less of a problem! Even those that does not use output cap, in fact in 49 cases of 50, use an output cap to at least the tweeter in loudspeaker. First and second order x-over uses 1 capacitor. Higher order can use several caps in series. 3-way system use capacitor(s) to midrange woofer and tweeter. Using active filters makes use of same number of coupling capacitors. Big difference here is using resistors instead of inductors. What about an inductor in signal rail. Well most of us use it! Have a look at a typical LSP crossover high-pass filter. .... and they think their system is truly DC-coupled
__________________
lineup |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Belgium, Limburg, Bree
|
Lineup,
You understood me wrong. In the schematic from post #6, "V7" is supposed to be a DC-servo circuit. But I just didn't draw the hole servo systeem. Yes, "P1" is there for to compensate the DC-offset. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the north
|
okay
![]() I misunderstand sometimes. Give me for anyway, this compensation trick is something i still use when working with bipolar input transistors JFET input has almost zero Bias Current
__________________
lineup |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| cmoy dc offset correction | magnade | Solid State | 0 | 5th August 2009 04:22 PM |
| Thermal Compensation Bias | hawkfeather | Solid State | 4 | 23rd January 2006 09:57 PM |
| Alternative offset correction for Alephs. | Netlist | Pass Labs | 4 | 28th September 2005 08:39 AM |
| dc offset correction pot | mirlo | Solid State | 5 | 31st July 2002 11:22 PM |
| Offset compensation? | Vg | Multi-Way | 2 | 6th June 2002 12:26 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.90606 seconds (9.68% PHP - 90.32% MySQL) with 11 queries |