|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
First of all I'm going to say that I'm a newbie to electronics, so this could all be a load of rubbish, but I had an idea...
Why not use a transformer to derive the "error signal" between the input and the output of an amp? If you connected the signal to the top of the primary winding of a 1:1 transformer, and the output to the bottom, wouldn't you have an error signal on the secondary which could be used for feedback? Any advantages to doing this or is it stupid? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Like this?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
|
That's pretty close to what I thought of, yes
However, I orignally thought of the feedback being applied to the primary instead of the secondary.. Like I said, I'm a newbie so I don't know what the best way of doing it would be
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Transformer coupled feedback was done in tranformer-coupled transistor push-pull amps for instance. Nowadays these are obsolete.
RF amplifiers is the place where transformer-coupled transistor amps have their merits (and where they are still used nowadays). Some of them actually use transformer-coupled NFB. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
the transformer is likely to introduce more distortion than the error you are trying to correct, very low distortion is not possible with transformer derived feedback. Quite useful in guitar / bass amplifiers. sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
You have very good idea and not stupid. I built the prototype based on this idea. Sound was very good! But there is better topology for trans. coupled amp. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
If you don't take into account that the transformer is unlinear (create distortion) and you don't need any galvanic insulation, what other possible advantage would this transformer create? You must always try to state the pros and cons when you have an idea. I admit though that this is hard when you haven't got enough of knowledge.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
peranders,
1 transistor transformer coupled and loaded VAS sounds better then "0" distortion OPAMP for me at least. This is what all diyers looking for? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
I don't argue with you that you find it better but I still have serious doubts.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
|
Do you like " nice distortion ", Rozak ? But it is your " problem "....
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Specific transformer based I/V | matejS | Digital Source | 1 | 8th October 2007 05:50 AM |
| Pressure based motional feedback. | tade | Subwoofers | 57 | 27th January 2007 03:01 PM |
| Transformer based phono stage | biovizier | Solid State | 7 | 31st October 2005 09:12 PM |
| The Great transformer based SE amp | PMA | Solid State | 7 | 10th October 2004 05:34 PM |
| know of a web-based calculator for a multiple feedback band pass filter? | travis | Everything Else | 2 | 13th August 2003 05:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11176 seconds (78.24% PHP - 21.76% MySQL) with 11 queries |